3D Camera from DXG for Summer 2010

the best price/quality i have found for 3D is 2 sanyo FH1.
if good light and tripod, the quality can be amazing.
cameras are small so you can mount them very close and with one remote control, you can even zoom in/out on both camera (very reliable).
editing is as easy as 2D, you just need to do all twice, so very time consuming.
result on a Zalman 3D screen is great.
 
what is the world coming to. Seriously, what consumer wants this?
Have you ever seen a 3D display that didn't need glasses? It's actually pretty cool. If it looks good, I can see there being some interest in it, but obviously we'd have to see it first...
 
Video has come far the the little camera's are pretty good

i have used 3 chip camera's and small aiptek's kodak's digicams
with good lighting they are nice only there lens and low light are horrid

You can tell a camera is bad by the lens for the most part, not even zoom
size matters, focal length and in general how much light can come into the camera
what is interesting about this camera is 3D, all in one for so little money! de ja niro $$$$$

all of the big companies hate lil ones, sony had to install SDHC readers in there camera's lol SONY
you can say thanks to lil companies like aiptek dxg and sanyo, maybe there will be a under $500 camera
wth quality lens assembly soon if this cam has a decent way for software to edit the clips or has a 3d softbundle
if there is anyone here with good info on 3D editing let me know, i know bluray supports 3D with a software update!
 
Last edited:
Wait, Barry, they have 3d displays where you don't need the glasses?! Where?
 
it is called autostereoscopic and the new Fujifilm FinePix W1 has one, the photo frame sold with is also like that and you can find up to 40" screen, but they cost the hell and the 3d effect vary with position so it sucks.
you can also have 2 flat screen mounted in a box with a mirror, but again . it is very sensitive to position of viewer, so hardly usable for big audience.
 
Back
Top