I'm working on a project ( or trying to anyway) that has only a few tracks.
When I use a 3-D track motion effect on say the opening title, The preview is bad enough to where I have to pre-render the section to get a clean look at it.
This takes alot of time even if it's only say, six seconds. the render time is a couple of minutes.
Most everything else I do is exceptable effects wise. So I guess my question is, Are the 3-D effects that much of a processor pig or am I experiencing some other problem?
I'm running a 2.3 gig Intel with SATA drives that I use soley for video work. The files are going to a seperate drive from the operating system drive. I've never had any issues untill I started using the track motion stuff.
2.3 gig not enough for this kinda thing?
Thanks!
When I use a 3-D track motion effect on say the opening title, The preview is bad enough to where I have to pre-render the section to get a clean look at it.
This takes alot of time even if it's only say, six seconds. the render time is a couple of minutes.
Most everything else I do is exceptable effects wise. So I guess my question is, Are the 3-D effects that much of a processor pig or am I experiencing some other problem?
I'm running a 2.3 gig Intel with SATA drives that I use soley for video work. The files are going to a seperate drive from the operating system drive. I've never had any issues untill I started using the track motion stuff.
2.3 gig not enough for this kinda thing?
Thanks!