24PA loses a stop?

pootify

Member
I was talking to a DP at a party recently and the topic of 24P vs 24PA came up (I'm a party animal, I know, I know). He told me that the reason he shoots on 24P setting is because 24PA loses a stop because of how it records. Is this true?
 
Don't see why it would. It's just the method used to fit 24 full frames in a 60 half-frame sequence. The original frames are still being shot the same.

Now, the default settings in F6 may make a difference, compared to F5... Don't know.

Dan
 
Progressive scan CCD's do indeed need more light when recording. So when recording 24p, you do indeed lose light (i'm not sure how many stops to be exact).
 
Well, yes, progressive needs more light, itself But there shouldn't be a difference between 24P and 24PA.

Dan
 
GenJerDan said:
Well, yes, progressive needs more light, itself But there shouldn't be a difference between 24P and 24PA.

Dan
Right. I don't think there it. In any case, do a simple test - aim the camera on a white wall, turn the marker on, set the iris so that it shows 50% (so the wall would be recorded close to medium gray, not white), and switch between 24P and 24PA to see if there is any difference.

I won't have access to my camera until Friday, so I can't test it for you :grin:

J.
 
I thought 30p lost a full stop from 60i. And that 24p was a 1/6 stop gain over 30p....
Hardly a visual difference, but maybe useful for light metering among the retentive.......
 
Depends on your shutter speed. At identical shutter speed, 24p, 24pa, and 30p will all be 1 stop slower than 60i (assuming a 1/60 shutter speed).

If you use 1/48 instead of 1/60 you can get a little more light sensitivity out of 24p, but that doesn't change the underlying sensitivity, it just changes the shutter speed.
 
Right. I'm thinking in film speak today..
180 degree shutter @ 30Fps is 1/60 or 24Fps is 1/48, etc..

I'll be back in video think probably later today or tomorrow.. What you're saying makes sense.
 
Back
Top