Dennis Wood
DVXuser Sponsor
It's a toss up. The XH-A1 has nearly perfect edge to edge sharpness, and it's chromatic aberration properties get cleaned up when using our flip adapter. Because it's CCD based, there is no rolling shutter to worrry about. Alternatively, the EX1 workflow in the studio and for same/day edits is more efficient with no tape capture to worry about. It's a stop or so more light efficient but suffers from some imaging issues that are not present on the Canon unit. It does have higher resolution capabilities so combined with our Zeiss lenses, there is nothing sharper.
I just spent the morning with a fellow from a well known snowboarding production company who has decided to integrate several XH-A1/Brevis MP.1 to combinations to mix with their 16mm mainstay footage. Their equipment needs to fit in a fairly light backpack subjected to extreme cold and physical abuse so a laptop etc for storage is out of the question. For tape workflow in HD, the XH-A1 would be my number one choice too. When I look at the Canon HD footage on our 42" panel, it still holds up extremely well against the EX1.
I just spent the morning with a fellow from a well known snowboarding production company who has decided to integrate several XH-A1/Brevis MP.1 to combinations to mix with their 16mm mainstay footage. Their equipment needs to fit in a fairly light backpack subjected to extreme cold and physical abuse so a laptop etc for storage is out of the question. For tape workflow in HD, the XH-A1 would be my number one choice too. When I look at the Canon HD footage on our 42" panel, it still holds up extremely well against the EX1.