puredrifting
Major Contributor
Just like 64gb P2 cards!
Agreed. Panasonic has had some of the same issues over the past few years as well.
D
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just like 64gb P2 cards!
Their track record is HOPELESS.... Have they even completed their orders for red one???
Anyone who indulges in this is plain BORED!
dude... Scarlet is that camera. :beer:
I'm not so sure yet. I do think it is a huge improvement for handheld doc stuff over the red (which is almost impossible for fast paced run n gun stuff).
I guess we will know more as the details start rolling out.
Actually, I take this back. But CMOS is used in other high-end digital cinematography cameras other than the RED One, including the Arri D-20.You do realize that much more expensive HD cameras than the RED One, cameras that Hollywood studios use for big-budget productions, also use CMOS, right? And large CCDs suffer limitations due to power issues, which is why they aren't used very much in the high-end, studio-quality equipment.
the reason I said that so excitedly is because this morning one of the first things I said about Scarlet was... "this is the ultimate documentary camera, just think of Planet Earth, being shot at 4k with Scarlet..."
Now you can still get all of the above. Now you can`t get anything from RED other than CG pages and a buggy version one. Lets put this in real perspective please.Not too long ago many would pay ~ $5000 for a Letus ultimate 35mm DOF adapter just to get that 35mm DOF with the loss of resolution and an ungodly long setup. Now you can get a compact camera that shoots S35mm sensor at 5k resolution with REDCODE.
Not too long ago, the cheapest 2/3" camera is HPX500 at $8k (after rebate) shooting only at 960 x 540 pixel, and now you can get Scarlet 2/3" at $2500 shooting at 3k resolution.
Yeah I thought it was a joke when Kholi first posted it actually. That he'd been REALLY busy photo-shopping and writing copy. I laughed out loud at the 3D part. Then I looked at all the detail in the lens descriptions and already existing Red hardware, etc. and realized this was no joke.
The CMOS based set has problems I don't want to deal with. CMOS is built in with inherent issues. Motion Tracking and matchmoving is next to impossible. The camera can't make any sudden movements. Sure it looks nice (most of the time) - but there are huge problems when it goes to visual post. CMOS is a pain to deal with.
Nothing saying Mysterium could be made into a CCD chipset rather than a CMOS based one. It would make the camera more widely usable, and would let the camera be used with digital effects.
Lets put this in real perspective please.
Lets just put this into perspective a bit...
Now you can still get all of the above. Now you can`t get anything from RED other than CG pages and a buggy version one. Lets put this in real perspective please.
Well....none of the matchmoving that I've seen were sitting on tripods. They were all moving and some were shakey handheld footage. As a matter of fact all were done with an HV20. I've never seen anything (matchmoving) done on Red.Looking okay and being okay are totally different things. Sure, I can matchmove a CMOS set when it's sitting on a tripod or moving slowly..
Well....none of the matchmoving that I've seen were sitting on tripods. They were all moving and some were shakey handheld footage. As a matter of fact all were done with an HV20. I've never seen anything (matchmoving) done on Red.
But if the movie "Jumper" was shot on a Red...than I take that last statement back...that would be my first Red matchmoving viewing.