Hunter Hampton
Carbonite Member
That is not the original footage from the d90, it has been edited and re-compressed. Dead give aways:
1. Every 5th frame is doubled even though the footage is showing that it was exported as 23.98 (thats why it looks so choppy- it shows it was improperly edited at 29.97 and then exported as 23.98)
2. The bit rate is 7.6Mb/s (this is less than 1/2 of the known bit rate range)
3. The file uploaded was an h.264 MOV not MJPEG (which is what the camera actually records files as)
So dont judge quality based on those clips, but with that said, they still look OK. I did notice some skew but that might stand out more from the crappy hand held camera work.
1. Every 5th frame is doubled even though the footage is showing that it was exported as 23.98 (thats why it looks so choppy- it shows it was improperly edited at 29.97 and then exported as 23.98)
2. The bit rate is 7.6Mb/s (this is less than 1/2 of the known bit rate range)
3. The file uploaded was an h.264 MOV not MJPEG (which is what the camera actually records files as)
So dont judge quality based on those clips, but with that said, they still look OK. I did notice some skew but that might stand out more from the crappy hand held camera work.