Protools: Do I need it? What do YOU use it for?

Again I'm not trying to be a PT rah rah boy but there are some misconceptions that get repeated a bunch.

First there are some workarounds but Le does have some semi serious post issues out of the box. However there is no reason to be buying a 003 and the DV tool kit. Now I'm speaking strictly from a film post perspective. If your recording music your needs will be different. There is no added power with the 003 over even the M-Box mini. The Mini runs under $300. Since the mini has no inputs it's not a great post choice so the real low priced all digi solution would be the M-Box at ~~$350. In post your not going to need more than two inputs, you actually hardly ever use any these days. You can cut a film with 32 tracks, until the "mix" systems came out in the late 90's PT was effectively limited to 16 mono tracks and a whole lot of very good sound tracks were produced on those systems. But TC would be nice and more tracks is always welcome. So the cheap entry is the academic version of PT Le. It comes with TC enabled and runs ~$150. Add a $100 M-Audio interface and you have a decent entry level post system. Sticking with Digi you could get the musicians toolkit (it's called something like that). That's ~$500 and adds TC and gives you 48 stereo or mono tracks. So that is still under $1000.

TC isn't used all that much in post editorial. Well it is but not in the gota see it all the time kind of way. You need it to get your session started in the right place. You need it so you can talk about "adding something at xx:xx:xx:xx". You need it to conform. But you don't really need it to edit. If the session comes from a system with TC and it's set up properly you will get a TC display in Le. I've supervised a number of mixed system shows and it's a little extra work but it's not that big a deal. If your on your own it could be a problem. But on the other hand the cheapest conforming software that I know of is around $800. A decent speaker system will set you back about the same. If your mixing you need a control surface and that's a grand. HD is pricey but you can run it on a G3 decently and very well on a G4. The same power in a "native" app like Le or performer will require a fast G5 at least and will really benefit from something much newer and faster. My point is that if your really working in post a few thousand for your core application is rather small potatoes in the overall cost and you should make the choice on your needs not on whether you can save a few bucks here and there. A full post setup with limited mixing is going to run you $30K - $60K plus whatever you need to do to the room.

I know five people are going to jump in and talk about their $200 post suites. They are all full of it. If you do a LOT on your own and get good used prices etc you can probably set your self up for $12,000. But work for a few years and add up what you added on to that system and you will be shocked. I certainly never had the change to drop $30,000 on a system. But it's well over that now. Little bits at a time, a bargain here getting a show to pay for X there. It adds up. And it's actually cheaper now since you don't HAVE to own a 3/4" deck (at like $14K new retail).

So get what you need. Same advice for OS's. If what you need works on the OS you know, stay where you are.

Pro Tools is the industry standard, but Digi has hobbled their LE product line with some important restrictions where film work is concerned, most particularly time code display. In order to see frame numbers anywhere in PTLE you need to buy the DV Toolkit 2 upgrade, which lists for $1300. It comes with a number of other very nice things, but it more than quintuples the price of the entry level systems (about $300 for an Mbox mini, $1600 with DVT2). Of course it's possible to use PTLE on a film project without seeing TC display, but I think it would get annoying pretty darn fast.

MOTU's AudioDesk, which is the same as Digital Performer minus the midi capabilities, and does have TC display, is included with all their interfaces. The cheapest is the UltraLite 3 at $550. On a budget, for film work purposes, this is probably a better deal if Pro Tools compatibilty is not absolutely required.

Otherwise, a proper PT/film work-ready setup will start at around $2000 give or take a few hundred, depending on the interface. A better PTLE/DVT2 system can set you back over 3 grand, and the HD systems *start* at $10K (list).

Digi has chosen to make it particularly tough for film folks at the entry level.
 
While it's true that Pro Tools is severely lacking when it comes to it's usefulness as a compositional tool, it has been steadily improving over the last few releases. Digidesign must feel the heat from Apple especially, who provide tons of features that help composers at an incredible price. Surely Digidesign is going to improve their MIDI functionality and compositional features in future versions of Pro Tools.

In other words, I wouldn't count Pro Tools out yet.

Actually I hope they don't. Or rather split PT into a post and a music focused app. Post features suffered quite awhile as Digi built up the music side. They came out with a slew of post features and then started making post harder because of MIDI and other music specific functions taking up prime keyboard and menu space. The two worlds don't cross over all that much so it would be great if one could just turn off stuff that was never used.

Apple is an incredible bargain. Their biggest problem is that they are stuck in this Apple only needs to work with Apple mindset that hurts them in a pro environment. If they could just focus a little energy on playing well with others they would be scary.
 
The Mini runs under $300. Since the mini has no inputs it's not a great post choice so the real low priced all digi solution would be the M-Box at ~~$350.

The Micro is the one with no inputs, and street price is about $250. The Mini has one mic in and 2 line ins and runs $300.
 
Actually I disagree with you on the splitting of Pro Tools idea. The main reason is that most of the money that Digi gets is from the music user base. For every one post sound editor there has to be at least ten people who do music, at least at the amateur level. If Digi splits the app into music and post versions, I'd be willing to bet that most of their energy would go into developing the music version of the app because that's where their money is. Digi would also have to increase the size of their company to accomodate the development of essentially two different apps.

As for your argument that Pro Tools has become convoluted with music features, I have to say that I agree. But then again, it doesn't really affect me much. I use keyboard shortcuts so much that I rarely need to go into the menus at all. Some of the "music" features have actually been really helpful in post editing. For example, I never thought that I'd use the Loop Trimmer, but I've found that on rare occasion I have used it to make my life easier. If they were to split the apps, I guarantee that there would be features that the music side has that would be useful in post and visa versa.

So in the end while I agree that music and post definitely have different needs, I don't want to be separated from the music side because I know which side would unfortunately win.
 
After using elastic audio a bit for music production, I think it might have great potential for video post. I'm specifically thinking of something like ADR and foley where you might need to go tweak the performance a bit to match video. Normally you would start hacking regions or maybe try to conform a performance with a plugin like Vocalign, but with EA you can manipulate the audio very precisely and without making a mess of it. :)
 
So the cheap entry is the academic version of PT Le. It comes with TC enabled and runs ~$150. Add a $100 M-Audio interface and you have a decent entry level post system. Sticking with Digi you could get the musicians toolkit (it's called something like that). That's ~$500 and adds TC and gives you 48 stereo or mono tracks. So that is still under $1000.


Not to sound picky, but as far as I know, Digidesign does not have an academic (as in school) version of ProTools. They may have in the past, I don't know. Also, the Music Production Toolkit does not add time code, the DV toolkit does.

I do wish they would offer a discount on the DV Toolkit and/or the Music Toolkit if you already own the other one. So many features overlap it seems like a waste to buy both.

I don't want to turn this into a ProTools bashing thread, so I'll stop.
 
Digi has some nice academic bundles... both for the Mbox 2 and an M-Powered/M-Audio hardware bundle... something like $389 for the Mbox 2 academic...
 
Not to sound picky, but as far as I know, Digidesign does not have an academic (as in school) version of ProTools. They may have in the past, I don't know. Also, the Music Production Toolkit does not add time code, the DV toolkit does.

I do wish they would offer a discount on the DV Toolkit and/or the Music Toolkit if you already own the other one. So many features overlap it seems like a waste to buy both.

I don't want to turn this into a ProTools bashing thread, so I'll stop.


http://www.academicsuperstore.com/product/search?qk_srch=digidesign&x=0&y=0

Some highlights
DV production Toolkit $649.95
M-Box 2 $349.95

But the software alone seems to be gone now. And it looks like your right about the music production kit, but I'm pretty sure it used to have a TC display, I know people who bought it for that reason. But I could be just dazed and confused.

Good catches. As I said I'm big on tools and compatibility, not big on "brand names". So there isn't any danger of a "brand war" with me.
Cheers
 
Why are we tallking about academic prices in a general discussion? Are we implying we should get them fraudulently?

No. There are a lot of students on this list and there are also a fare number of educators, all of them qualify. And if you want to learn about sound and Pro Tools there are classes at JC's (at least around here) and then again you are a student. You can I'm sure "fake" it but there are an awful lot of people here who qualify legitimately. Actually I do, twice. I was taking a FCP class at a JC and I teach post sound at a film school.
 
After using elastic audio a bit for music production, I think it might have great potential for video post. I'm specifically thinking of something like ADR and foley where you might need to go tweak the performance a bit to match video. Normally you would start hacking regions or maybe try to conform a performance with a plugin like Vocalign, but with EA you can manipulate the audio very precisely and without making a mess of it. :)

It would be useful IF it wasn't locked to fixed increments and sudden changes. Plus you can introduce sync issues. Time stretching regions is generally the way to go if VocAlign doesn't work for you. If they allowed smooth movement between changes it would be a fantastic post tool but...
 
A player that is coming on pretty strong (depending on what you do) is Reaper. I like it and it would be a really good alternative to ProTools IF it could import and export OMF or AAF. So right now while it is not bad for working to picture you can't import the tracks the picture editor has nor can you send your session to another system. So as a Foley recorder/ editor, or ADR editor,it's OK but not being able to bring tracks in is a killer. Not being able to export is a smaller issue since you can bounce tracks out and do it that way. Actually you could do that to import also so depending on how much time you want to waste dealing with splitting them all up after import...

On the PC side there is a third party program that will do conversions from PT to Reaper to OMF, but there isn't anything in the Mac universe.
 
Hmmm, allow me to express my love of PT... warts and all.

Just finished editing hours of non-pro voiceover. I can edit so damn fast in PT, it's ridiculous. Finished series was about 90 mins. total - that was a LOT of audio, all easily managed.

Killer to tweak audio problems from footage, too. I generally do well enough on set that I don't have to take everything through PT, but glad to have it when I need it.

When I'm not working, I like writing spacey rock for kicks. Strike is a simply badass drum composing tool. Sheesh, I'm still on PT8 - looking forward to faster bounces one day...

I've got a few months left with a Firewire 410 - next OS upgrade should put it out to pasture. Luckily, I grabbed an Apogee Mini-Me a few years back. All I need is SPDIF in an interface and I get pretty glorious input.
 
This is a LONG thread. My post wasn't arguing against PT, I use it every day, but I notice Reaper was never mentioned. I actually used it on location the other day because I needed more inputs than I had available with PTLe hardware (older laptop) and wasn't going to breakdown and haul the TDM system to the space. I would have used BoomRecorder because it's fantastic for production recording but this was music and some was being done with over dubs so I needed to be able to monitor various tracks in ways that are not what Boom Recorder was designed to do. It was solid the whole time.

It's an option and I found it a lot easier for me to work with the Nuendo.
 
Back
Top