cordvision
Well-known member
I would love to see some pictures of the production unit? Do we get to see them anytime soon?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hi Brian,
I received the achromat today, 2/4/08 in the PM. Thank you also for the rebate on the shipping charge. Also, thank you for the RR baseball cap. I will wear it with pride and advertise it well by generating great images with my DIY adapter. By the way, my adapter looks very promising, even with my cheap arse Asian macro. I am sure the achromat will improve my images ten fold.
I would also like to apologize if I sounded abrasive. I am 99% of the time a very docile, calm, patient person. The other 1% of me gets a little perturbed when things don't get, literaly, "delivered" on deadline. Being in the film/TV business for 21 years (ABC network/ owning a production co.), tight deadlines are a given factor and a given denominator. My intentions on your product was not to denounce its quality, but bring light to what I thought was a weak link to your superior product, which is your shipping info.
Please feel free to post this on the DVXuser website where I originally ranted on the post "why I will not buy redrock". I hope this situation will up the ante on an already great product.
Aloha from Hawaii,
[kaimakana]
Odd...the reason I wont buy a Redrock is:
Poor light performance
Bad Edge to Edge sharpness
Overall Sharpness is low
I guess my reasons are different![]()
Hi,
Have you identified an adapter that performs better than the M2 within a comparable price range? I'm purchasing soon and am open to all suggestions.
Thanks a million.
DVX100B - G5 - FCP Studio 2
I
I'm not sure how the SG Pro can be better than the M2 or how it can produce more film-like imagery since it's basically the exact same design. The M2 is rock solid in terms of construction as opposed to the cheaper SG Pro.
I've been using the M2 for a few years now and I've researched the other adapters quite a bit and it seems to me that they ALL have their own drawbacks and idiosyncrasies. The most comparable I could find to the M2 in terms of the quality of imagery I've seen is the Letus. Some people swear that the M2 is not as good as the Letus and some swear that the Letus is not as good as the M2. I have yet to see a clear example of someone's footage that supports either assertion.
I really don't have a problem with the upside down imagery the M2 produces and I'd be reluctant to add yet another mass of reflective surfaces or lenses to the optical path. Monitoring the upside down footage is easy and not even mildly annoying anymore to me and flipping it in post is easy also.
I'm not sure how the SG Pro can be better than the M2 or how it can produce more film-like imagery since it's basically the exact same design. The M2 is rock solid in terms of construction as opposed to the cheaper SG Pro.
One other thing to consider is the fact that you'll see more M2 adapters in rental houses than any of the other adapters which says a lot about its design, construction, and quality of footage it produces.
.
I'm not sure how the SG Pro can be better than the M2 or how it can produce more film-like imagery since it's basically the exact same design. The M2 is rock solid in terms of construction as opposed to the cheaper SG Pro.
Have you ever used an SGpro? I personally found the SGpro to be better built than the m2 and I had the chance to "play" with both....
I thought the same thing... til I sold my M2 and bought the Letus Ex. As much as I loved my M2 and still use Redrock products... it's time for Redrock to step it up with a new adapter. Try using a Letus Ex or SG Pro for a week, then try going back to your M2. =\ I LOVE Redrock equipment. I can't wait for the Mattebox to go with my RR Follow Focus. There's no better choice for me in those areas but the LetusEx and SGpro are definitely ahead.
The M2, however, is good enough.
Are you saying the SG Pro and Letus are significantly better than the M2?
What online examples do you know of that supports that assertion?
.
No online assertions. My own eye assertions, though. I can also point you to several owners that have switched from M2 to SGpro based on the fact that they are NOT optically the same.
Also, this is definitely subjective. You may prefer a softer look to your footage, I do now prefer a sharper image because of the degrading that occurs when post comes into play. Also, sharper's a little better for projection when considering an HVX.
I'm having a real hard time finding some exceptional SG Pro footage online and their website won't play the example clips in either of the browsers I use.
To tell you the truth, I'm leaning towards the Letus 35 Extreme pretty heavily and I appreciate your feedback because I AM a little tired of the softness and vignetting.
.
You have to download the footage from the sgpro website. Click on the link under "footage details" that says "link: please right click and 'save as.'"