Indywannabe
Well-known member
On the Buffalo -- Good drive for all the reasons you mentioned. The tradeoffs are performance vs. data protection of RAID 5, and performance vs. data sharing of the Ethernet.
For heads down FCS performance on the Mac, I would recommend FW800 or eSATA for connectivity and no RAID 5.
Using RAID 0 as an throughput enhancer option also has it's tradeoffs. RAID 0 most benefits applications with multi-stream processing. However, it is scary to think that you are doubling your points of failure. But we all stay backed up, right?
I use FCS one app at a time, and even then only on limited files at a time. The Apple guys say that RAID 0 will probably not provide me the full benefit.
...oh...I use a LaCie 500 Quadra for FCP projects, no problems yet...but I do backup to a Western Digital (which is ssssllllloooowww for file xfer) and store them for archival when they fill up.
For heads down FCS performance on the Mac, I would recommend FW800 or eSATA for connectivity and no RAID 5.
Using RAID 0 as an throughput enhancer option also has it's tradeoffs. RAID 0 most benefits applications with multi-stream processing. However, it is scary to think that you are doubling your points of failure. But we all stay backed up, right?
I use FCS one app at a time, and even then only on limited files at a time. The Apple guys say that RAID 0 will probably not provide me the full benefit.
...oh...I use a LaCie 500 Quadra for FCP projects, no problems yet...but I do backup to a Western Digital (which is ssssllllloooowww for file xfer) and store them for archival when they fill up.
Last edited: