True|Funk|Soldier
Member
I am completely new to filmmaking...for all intents and purposes, I know nothing. 
But, I am a fast learner and bring a lot of enthusiasm to most things I put my head to, so I have high hopes.
I am looking to use the camera for a couple of things...
Underwater Documentary-style filmmaking. My friends and I regularly scuba dive off the New England coast and I would like to be able to begin filming some of the crazy things we see. In general, whether because of the wider availability of housings, or because of the low-light sensitivity, there is fairly widespread use of the FX1/Z1.
In fact, I had pretty much settled on the Z1 until I saw some of the results of the HVX-200. To my eye, the colors just appear richer and more lifelike. Throw in the ability to get that real "film" look, and I am now in a bit of doubt.
FYI, for the kinds of quality we are getting now in a HC3 with limited light sources (one 18W lighthead, I believe), check out the following clip from a friend of mine: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TFpz605Cnw&feature=RecentlyWatched&page=1&t=t&f=b
Topside Narrative Filmmaking . As much as I love the notion of filming the next great documentary for NG, I also would like the ability to try my hand at writing and filming traditional shorts.
My question...
Given these kinds of interests, and knowing what you folks know about the available options out there (and assuming that the budget for the camera is roughly maxed at 5k), is the HVX the best option? Or would you stick with the Z1 for whatever reason? In terms of "future proofing", which would you characterize as the camera with the longer lifespan? Which is going to grow with me and allow me to do more as I become a better, more knowledgeable operator?
Thanks in advance. I appreciate that this is a long post for a first post to these forums. This place seems friendly and informative, which is great for someone like me who could use the help.
Thanks,
Matt
But, I am a fast learner and bring a lot of enthusiasm to most things I put my head to, so I have high hopes.
I am looking to use the camera for a couple of things...
Underwater Documentary-style filmmaking. My friends and I regularly scuba dive off the New England coast and I would like to be able to begin filming some of the crazy things we see. In general, whether because of the wider availability of housings, or because of the low-light sensitivity, there is fairly widespread use of the FX1/Z1.
In fact, I had pretty much settled on the Z1 until I saw some of the results of the HVX-200. To my eye, the colors just appear richer and more lifelike. Throw in the ability to get that real "film" look, and I am now in a bit of doubt.
FYI, for the kinds of quality we are getting now in a HC3 with limited light sources (one 18W lighthead, I believe), check out the following clip from a friend of mine: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TFpz605Cnw&feature=RecentlyWatched&page=1&t=t&f=b
Topside Narrative Filmmaking . As much as I love the notion of filming the next great documentary for NG, I also would like the ability to try my hand at writing and filming traditional shorts.
My question...
Given these kinds of interests, and knowing what you folks know about the available options out there (and assuming that the budget for the camera is roughly maxed at 5k), is the HVX the best option? Or would you stick with the Z1 for whatever reason? In terms of "future proofing", which would you characterize as the camera with the longer lifespan? Which is going to grow with me and allow me to do more as I become a better, more knowledgeable operator?
Thanks in advance. I appreciate that this is a long post for a first post to these forums. This place seems friendly and informative, which is great for someone like me who could use the help.
Thanks,
Matt