Realdvxuser
Well-known member
Ok guys, here's the situation:
We have a job to deliver our very first commercial which should air on television soon. And it has to be as good as possible, but we are quite worried on how to handle codecs, output etc.
We've already done the shooting for this, with both a DVC-PRO camera as well as a DVX100a (PAL). As it turned out the footage that the cameraman with the DVC-PRO camera shot, sucked. It was really bad. Even worse then our own DVX footage, so we've actually chosen to use DV footage, even though 'in the books' it should be of less quality.
In Final Cut Pro we have captured all the footage in a DVC PRO timeline, in which we are working now, (so also the DVX footage). We have sent some clips to Motion to add motion graphics and exported this as an 'uncompressed 10-bit clip' and put this back onto the timeline in FCP.
I've just read an article that stated that as soon as one changes codec from DV to uncompressed or other codecs, information is actually lost. So does this mean that by having the DVX footage in the DVC PRO timeline, we have degraded our footage?
Also, if we do any color grading we can only check this on a normal tv hanging on FCP, not a calibrated monitor. If we put on a 'broadcast safe' filter, will this save us from possible color disasters?
The most important question of all:
Can anybody please explain the pipeline we must follow in order to get the best possible quality on tv with our combination of DV footage with motion graphics? We can deliver our commercial to the station as a file, so we do not need to write it back to a DV tape...
Cheers for your help!
--
yohenk
The Netherlands
We have a job to deliver our very first commercial which should air on television soon. And it has to be as good as possible, but we are quite worried on how to handle codecs, output etc.
We've already done the shooting for this, with both a DVC-PRO camera as well as a DVX100a (PAL). As it turned out the footage that the cameraman with the DVC-PRO camera shot, sucked. It was really bad. Even worse then our own DVX footage, so we've actually chosen to use DV footage, even though 'in the books' it should be of less quality.
In Final Cut Pro we have captured all the footage in a DVC PRO timeline, in which we are working now, (so also the DVX footage). We have sent some clips to Motion to add motion graphics and exported this as an 'uncompressed 10-bit clip' and put this back onto the timeline in FCP.
I've just read an article that stated that as soon as one changes codec from DV to uncompressed or other codecs, information is actually lost. So does this mean that by having the DVX footage in the DVC PRO timeline, we have degraded our footage?
Also, if we do any color grading we can only check this on a normal tv hanging on FCP, not a calibrated monitor. If we put on a 'broadcast safe' filter, will this save us from possible color disasters?
The most important question of all:
Can anybody please explain the pipeline we must follow in order to get the best possible quality on tv with our combination of DV footage with motion graphics? We can deliver our commercial to the station as a file, so we do not need to write it back to a DV tape...
Cheers for your help!
--
yohenk
The Netherlands