Rodney V. Smith
DVXFest Promo Guru
On my first feature film, "Mort" we were using the DVX100 and invested in a 16:9 anamorphic lens from Panasonic. heavy and expensive piece of glass.
Since then I've gone on to get my own DVX100A and I've been primarily using the Squeeze mode (definitely not the same as the lens which is truly wide instead of just faking it)
Now that I'm adding a 35mm lens adapter to my camera for filmshoots, I started to wonder about using the anamorphic lens since that does seem to get more of the shot in than just using the squeeze mode. Has anyone attempted this yet? Or anything similar?
I've tried just manually placing it in front of the 35mm and the results are phenomenal,but I'm also wondering if it is worth it, and how much light I'll be losing by adding more glass to the front of the camera.
Since then I've gone on to get my own DVX100A and I've been primarily using the Squeeze mode (definitely not the same as the lens which is truly wide instead of just faking it)
Now that I'm adding a 35mm lens adapter to my camera for filmshoots, I started to wonder about using the anamorphic lens since that does seem to get more of the shot in than just using the squeeze mode. Has anyone attempted this yet? Or anything similar?
I've tried just manually placing it in front of the 35mm and the results are phenomenal,but I'm also wondering if it is worth it, and how much light I'll be losing by adding more glass to the front of the camera.