Feature shot in 15 days with HVX

darwinandpaine

Well-known member
I just finished a 15 day feature shoot with the HVX/M2 combo (720pn) and I thought I'd give a little report.

First of all, my AC and I rated the HVX with the M2 at 160 ISO. This means that you need a helluva lotta light. I was rarely able to get my stop above f4 indoors (without blinding the talent) and shot a lot of the film at 1/24 because I had to. Fortunately, the film was very talkie and the 1/24 didn't really hurt us. When there was action, I always tried to keep the shutter at 1/60 by adding a bit more light and hoping the talent didn't complain. A small interior generally required about 3-4k of light to get the contrast ratios right --- even when there was a lot of light pouring through windows (the movie was shot entirely on location, mostly in people's houses or local businesses).

I shot mostly with an 85mm f2, a 50mm f1.4, and a 135mm f2.8 (all Nikons). I occasionally used a 24mm f2.8. Shooting at f4 or wider means that you have to have a good AC who can really pull focus well, and I was lucky on that account. My AC was fantastic and the actors were great at hitting their marks. If you're going to shoot with the M2, a good AC is a must!

The biggest problem with the M2 is that you cannot shoot into any kind of light --- at least not with any of my lenses. Anything that went above 105 IRE would cause horrible ghosting. We were constantly having to diffuse the practicals and for one night-time fire scene, we had to take the M2 off completely as the ghosting made it look as though the actor's pants were on fire. Perhaps better lenses would not have done this. I don't know. (Any suggestions from other M2 owners?)

As for workflow, we had two 8 gig P2 cards and two 4 gig P2 cards. We had a dedicated media management person who would take the cards and offload them. We only used one card at a time, and when we got down to the 2 minute mark we would fly the card out and dump it via my G4 laptop. This worked great and we never had to use the 4 gig cards.

We did run into some trouble with the hard drives. The director had bought two 1TB "MyBook" external drives from Western Digital. We put them into a RAID 1 configuration and had two 500GB mirrors for offloading. After only one week, the first drive's Firewire port failed. Fortunately, the USB 2.0 and FW800 ports were still good. So, we started using the second drive, and to our dismay, after the second week, that drive went bad completely --- none of the ports worked and the primary drive went down completely. We ended up swapping the data to a third drive and copying it over to the first drive. From that point on, we used a PC with USB 2.0 for the transfer to the original "MyBook" which was still mirrored and useful despite its bad FW400 port. The worse part about this experience was how completely useless Western Digital support was. They had nothing to say but, "that's never happened before." I would recommend that you steer clear of these drives for anything valuable.

Our lighting kit consisted of the following:
Flolight 1400
Lowel Caselite
Lowel Scandle
Alzo Digital 2000
Two 1000w Arri Lights
Three Lowel Pro lights
Two 575w HMIs
Three 650w tweenies
Two China balls
and more (including some Kinos we hardly used)...

The three florescents (Flolight, Caselite, and Scandle) were our workhorses. They're really fantastic when you're looking for a big, broad, natural light look. With daylight tubes, they work perfectly with open windows and run cool so your talent doesn't melt. The Alzo 2000 was also fantastic at bringing up overall room light (it's rated at 2400w equivalent). It also runs pretty cool, but the fan is a bit noisy --- better for wide masters.

We used the 575 HMI mostly to mimic sunlight coming in from outside. It's a big light and a pain to set up, so we used it only when we had to. The Lowel Pro lights were great for putting on a boom and adding a little backlight. The rest of the lights were used less and often only bounced into the ceiling for some nice soft fill. The Arri Lights are fantastic for this, but they heat up the room like crazy.

Finally, everyone was impressed with the images. The HVX/M2 combo does a great job of creating the "film look" on a budget. I love working with this camera and could not be happier with it's performance on this project. (The one drawback is low light performance and the known issues of noise at around 30 IRE. The one truly bad looking scene we shot was the fireside scene. It wasn't the fire itself, but the smoke which macroblocked and looked awful.)

The M2 is also a fantastic tool, and I have nothing but good things to say about what Redrock has accomplished. If anyone has any other questions, feel free to ask.
 
That was good read, it's always good to read about someone else's filmmaking experiences. Oh and thanks for the heads up on that drive, I was actually looking to get the same one, now I'm not.

Good luck with your film. Post up some footage!
 
darwinandpaine, thanks for the info, great read.

If you are up to sharing more, I would be interested to learn about, preferred camera settings, crew and what it took to shoot a feature in 15 days and any budget info and advise from your experience. Oh, a few frames in due course.

All the best with post. :thumbsup:
 
Great thread.
Would love to get more info on the scene setup. I'm interested in knowing how far the lights were from talent, where the camera was and things like that. I'm assuming you didn't want to keep the lenses as wide open as they could so that you would gain a little more depth of field and to make the image a little sharper(at the expense of light? right?)
How did the focus pulling took place? on board LCD? (doubt it) Follow focus & external Video monitor? follow focus with marks on it and focus puller with cable attachment?? Any dolly shots how did these complicate focus?

I guess my quesitons are pretty basic. but sometimes you learn alot from asking broad questions and letting the person explain their way of doing things.
Thanks,
Luis
 
3-4k of light. That is a lot. I've been getting by with about half that with the stock lens... That's quite a bit to deal with.. and we all know the cam loves the light anyway.


Anychance to see any footie, Brian? And when will the next mr. Diety grace the boards... love it
 
The reference to 3-4kw of light needs to be put into a bit of perspective. It is not necessarily "a lot of light". It must be considered in terms of the efficiency of the lighting unit and the design of the unit. ( reflector/fresnel etc)

eg a 4kw softlight does not provide the "amount" of light that a 4kw HMI unit produces .

A more helpful reference to the amount of light on a set is foot/candles.
 
Shooter is right. I was assuming (incorrectly) that people know the lights I'm talking about and could do the math. Sorry.

Our main set-up usually required the 1400w Flolight, and at least the two Lowels (800w each). The big flo brought up overall light levels and then the Caselite and Scandle where used as source and fill. Then we'd always try to get a little back light in there as well. The point is, to get your stop up with the M2, you need a lot of light. So plan on it.

To answer some other questions...
Shooting a 93-page script in 15 days was absolutely INSANE! I don't think I'd do it again. Every day was 14 hours minumum, and we had to be moving like crazy people. I was frequently unhappy with the amount of time we got to light a scene, and we were often shooting our rehearsals. Sometimes, I was just getting happy with the camera movement and framing when the director said, "moving on." I don't think the director got all the coverage he needed and I certainly wouldn't want to be the editor on this movie.

It was also directed by a first-time director, who should have done at least another two weeks of pre-production. So, that hurt us too. On top of that, he was also the writer and (IMO) too tied to the material. He over-directed the actors and had to deal with a small mutiny on day 10. Then, he never got the cooperation he wanted from the actors from that point on. But they did a fantastic job regardless (again, IMO).

Budget for the movie started at $50k but is now up to about $70k (I was just told). My crew consited of the media manager (she also worked my batteries, lenses, focus rings, etc...) my AC, one grip, a sound guy and a boom operator. We really needed about three more people, but couldn't afford it. Everyone on my crew did multiple duty -- grip, gaffer, electrician, etc... --- whatever needed to be done.

The producers managed to get two semi-names for the project, Kevin Dobson from Knott's Landing and Bill McNamara from "Copycat." Ironically, I think the no-name actors --- the female lead and the two supporting actors were the best thing to happen to this movie.

Focus pulling was done with a Cavision follow focus unit and the Redrock rings. We also used a whip quite a bit and found it invaluable on certain set-ups where space was at a premium. (I would NOT buy any follow focus that doesn't take a whip.) We always set marks and worked through the moves. My AC was tops!

We also had two dollies we used on this shoot -- the new rideable Indie Dolly, which I LOVE!!!! we used it on 1.5 inch track --- and a Shooter Scooter. Both worked great for what we needed, but we didn't get to use them as much as the Director and I wanted because of the set-up time. Every dolly shot caused the AD to pop a vein in his forehead.

I will try to get some footage up soon. I'm not editing, but I have some stuff on that third drive I mentioned in the earlier post.
 
Thanks for the further feedback and I appreciate the comments on having a whip capable FF, good point to factor in. Looking forward to some frames.

btw, I recall watching the 15minutes trailer months ago, a laugh riot. :D
 
Hey Brian, great post. I'm jealous. Can't wait to see some footage. If it's anything like what I've already seen of yours then it'll be kick arse.

Pete.
 
Also, 160 ISO is only one stop off the bare HVX, so...not that bad. And personally, as much as I love the fleuros, I find they drop off rapidly (in comparison to a tungsten of similar output) the further back they get from the talent.

Pete.
 
Okay, here's some quick footy. This scene required a lot of light because the area we were covering was so large. For the record, we had about twenty minutes to light this, and about 7-10 minutes to shoot. This is only one piece of coverage, but I like this shot.
http://mrdeity.com/amelevator.html

Peter... you are absolutely right about the falloff of the flos. To get the back area of this scene lit (a rather large area), we used the 575w HMIs. But for small locations, I think the flos are great.
 
Brian, nice setup man.

What arm are you using to attach the Marshall? I am looking into the Marshall with a Noga connected to the handle screw mount, where you have the battery, which looks like the external power to the M2? I am concerned about connecting a Marshall on that slide shoe mount near the mic, like you have. Any feedback on that?

I also have an EZFX Junior Jib, and have the Indie Dolly earmarked and quoted for acquisition, if we get our ultra low budgie off the ground.

Edit: Brain = Brian :d
 
Last edited:
darwinandpaine said:
Okay, here's some quick footy.

Thanks for the clip mate, it's very sharp on the focused point and nicely lit.

Just a question, you push to the guy at the back of the elevator (I think around 45sec in) for a moment, then back to the guy on right of screen. Why didn't you push focus to the guy in the background as the girls leave the frame, then hold, as the point of drama seems to be centered on him? First time director?

Pete.
 
Christopher Barry said:
What arm are you using to attach the Marshall?

That's part of my old sticky pod. I wouldn't recommend it. I'll be getting the Israeli arm next time I'm at Filmtools.

peter orland said:
Just a question, you push to the guy at the back of the elevator (I think around 45sec in) for a moment, then back to the guy on right of screen. Why didn't you push focus to the guy in the background as the girls leave the frame, then hold, as the point of drama seems to be centered on him? First time director?

Well, first of all, I don't even know if that was the take that will be chosen. I just grabbed a clip and threw it up there for youz guyz to see. Second, at the break-neck speed we were going, we didn't have the luxury of thinking such things through --- I honestly don't remember if we even talked about the "point of drama" in this scene. That's why I think a 15-day shoot for a 93 page script is insane. We didn't have the time to do anything but light, and shoot --- and then we barely had time for that. I expect it to be somewhat disappointing. I think there's probably less than a handful of shots that I would want to put on my reel.

I have an 87 page script that I think I could shoot in 12 days, but only because I would also be the DP and I know exactly what I want in every single frame. The script also has a ton of MOS --- which I'm sure you know, makes everything so much easier. This thing was talkie as hell, and the director made the classic first-time-director mistake of thinking that every shot in every scene was crucial, and often didn't know that he already had what he needed.

I wasn't kidding when I said that we were running around like crazy people (can you hear the frustration?).
 
darwinandpaine said:
That's part of my old sticky pod. I wouldn't recommend it. I'll be getting the Israeli arm next time I'm at Filmtools.?
Thanks Brian. Good to get feedback on mounting options for the Marshall.

The 15 day feature now seems out the the question for me, I will have to factor at least 3 weeks or more. Also a lot of pre-production work will help, something I am planning on. Great info/reality check in this thread. :thumbsup:
 
Hi, I don't have any questions... but I just wanted to thank you for sharing the footage and info! It looks really good, and I sure don't envy you for those crazy setup times!:eek:

:dankk2:
 
Christopher Barry said:
The 15 day feature now seems out the the question for me, I will have to factor at least 3 weeks or more.

I don't want to give you the wrong impression. Like I said, I think I have an 87 page script that I could shoot in 12 days, but only because there's a lot of MOS and I know what I want. You may be able to shoot your movie in 15 days --- I don't know, because I haven't read the script and don't know what's involved. But with this script, a first-time director, and a lack of pre-production, it was too tight.

The other thing that I learned on this shoot is that... I think you either go big, big, with more money and a longer shoot, or stay completely small and go totally guerilla. This production had a lot of great locations and a nearly full-blown staff -- Line producer, UPM, Second AD, Production coordinator, Location manager, Hair, Make-up, Production designer, asst. Production designer, Production assistant, etc... -- everything you'd have on a bigger budget movie, and I think that actually hurt us. This was also a crew that hadn't worked together before, so it took us about a week before we were really working well together. I think if you had a small crew that was really on the ball and could move quickly and with precision, I think 15 days, given the right script, could be done and done well (did that sound Rumsfeldian?).

The other thing to keep in mind is to fine-tune your script for your budget and number of days. Be reasonable and don't reach too far.

On this shoot, we had great locations, but we didn't have the time to shoot them like they should have been shot. So, in the end, what good were these great locations? You just have to be brutally honest with yourself when it comes to doing this stuff quick and dirty. My script has three main characters, and the majority of it will be shot in three locations. I believe we had 11 locations for these 15 days, and a couple of them had time limits.

In other words, think hard before you attempt to make your small movie look really big. The effort you make in the attempt may hurt the substance of your movie. And as people on these boards have said time and time again (rightly), content is king!
 
Back
Top