Preston Ford Capra
New member
Just wondering what others thought.
I have a group of investors who want to produce my script and I get to direct (also edit). I guess that's the good news.
The bad news.
1. I don't get to pick my dp.
2. I can't even bring anyone onto the production, even if they'll cost the same as the crew that will be provide, even if they're a Hollywood veteran vs. for example a guy who lights for the local TV station (nothing against the local guy, he could be great but I've never worked with him so I don't know). On the plus side I have seen one person's reel and he's good (not the dp or gaffer though).
3. I'll be lucky if I get to pick my actors.
4. I get a director's cut. ( guess that could be good news)
Okay my thoughts on not taking the job (yeah some will think I'm crazy).
1. I can be fired (so they get the script cheap).
2. The budget is smaller ($750,000) than I really need so to make it work. But I can do it so I need someone I've worked with and that I know can make it happen. My dp has shot numerous movies and has directed 4 films in the $1m range so like myself he knows how to do something at a cheaper price but make it look like it costs more.
3. I know this is another crazy one. But the location is as much a part of the story as anything etc. Thing shooting a desert with nothing around for miles and then you have to shoot in Hawaii and that doesn't fit the story. No its not that bad. But who knows who might read this site and figure out some things.
My first counter offer about hearing the good news on the phone was:
1. I'll forgo part of my payment to cover the cost of my dp and a producer I know. In other words they won't be out anything.
2. I have someone who might match funds.
I was rejected on both ideas right off the bat. I can understand the producer, but my dp. And the matching funds I can see they want no partners.
Okay they do know that I was part of the producing team on a film that's in the American Film Market as I write this. I would say we're about 90% of the way closing a deal with the a cable network to buy the film and to make two sequeals. Plus they know that we already have another feature lined up next summer.
So my new offer might be this.
1. I can't be fired as a director (maybe the reason why the footage looks bad is because you stuck me with a dp who's only done video, again nothing against anyone who's shot video. I'd take some time dvxuser Steven Dempsey as my dp any day) because I'm not giving away the script.
2. Again I'll forgo part of my payment to cover the cost of my dp, and still my producer (but the last one is not a deal breaker, but the first is probably a very good breaker).
3. Two director cuts.
4. Of course back end.
Over the course of my life I have produced several feature films, directed and produced over 10 music videos and throw in a few TV spots. So its not like I haven't done anything.
So I just thought I'd like to hear (or really read) what others think.
I have a group of investors who want to produce my script and I get to direct (also edit). I guess that's the good news.
The bad news.
1. I don't get to pick my dp.
2. I can't even bring anyone onto the production, even if they'll cost the same as the crew that will be provide, even if they're a Hollywood veteran vs. for example a guy who lights for the local TV station (nothing against the local guy, he could be great but I've never worked with him so I don't know). On the plus side I have seen one person's reel and he's good (not the dp or gaffer though).
3. I'll be lucky if I get to pick my actors.
4. I get a director's cut. ( guess that could be good news)
Okay my thoughts on not taking the job (yeah some will think I'm crazy).
1. I can be fired (so they get the script cheap).
2. The budget is smaller ($750,000) than I really need so to make it work. But I can do it so I need someone I've worked with and that I know can make it happen. My dp has shot numerous movies and has directed 4 films in the $1m range so like myself he knows how to do something at a cheaper price but make it look like it costs more.
3. I know this is another crazy one. But the location is as much a part of the story as anything etc. Thing shooting a desert with nothing around for miles and then you have to shoot in Hawaii and that doesn't fit the story. No its not that bad. But who knows who might read this site and figure out some things.
My first counter offer about hearing the good news on the phone was:
1. I'll forgo part of my payment to cover the cost of my dp and a producer I know. In other words they won't be out anything.
2. I have someone who might match funds.
I was rejected on both ideas right off the bat. I can understand the producer, but my dp. And the matching funds I can see they want no partners.
Okay they do know that I was part of the producing team on a film that's in the American Film Market as I write this. I would say we're about 90% of the way closing a deal with the a cable network to buy the film and to make two sequeals. Plus they know that we already have another feature lined up next summer.
So my new offer might be this.
1. I can't be fired as a director (maybe the reason why the footage looks bad is because you stuck me with a dp who's only done video, again nothing against anyone who's shot video. I'd take some time dvxuser Steven Dempsey as my dp any day) because I'm not giving away the script.
2. Again I'll forgo part of my payment to cover the cost of my dp, and still my producer (but the last one is not a deal breaker, but the first is probably a very good breaker).
3. Two director cuts.
4. Of course back end.
Over the course of my life I have produced several feature films, directed and produced over 10 music videos and throw in a few TV spots. So its not like I haven't done anything.
So I just thought I'd like to hear (or really read) what others think.