Inexistence
Well-known member
I'd like to know this as well.D_and_G said:Really ?
Whose ?
:beer:
oh and D_and_G, is that for Dolce & Gabanna or something else?
just playin'
don't hurt me
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'd like to know this as well.D_and_G said:Really ?
Whose ?
:beer:
Inexistence said:I'd like to know this as well.
oh and D_and_G, is that for Dolce & Gabanna or something else?
just playin'
don't hurt me
HybridCreations said:First off, the tone of your reply comes off as a bit defensive and bitter. I merely offered up my opinion and if you disagree that's fine, but this is a DISCUSSION board not a medium to show how "right" you are.
With that said, I was not aware that you entered an NC entry. I'm sorry that you have not gotten as much feedback as you like but I'm sure you got more than you would have by posting outside the umbrella of this festival. That's all I meant by my "Why not enter a shortened film?" comments. In fact, I applaud you for submitting an entry that wasn't eligible for a prize.
I tend to look at shorts as practice. I don't think anyone's short here is going to Sundance (although some probably could). I also don't think anyone's Horrorfest entry is going to be the defining film of their career, so why be so chained to the purity of the piece as a whole. If it loses a little something because it has to be cut down so be it. If more people watch the shortened version and like it, perhaps they will watch the longer version down the line. It's up to the filmmaker then to finish it as a full piece and offer it up. There are a number of things viewers could comment on in a cut-down piece. Cinematography, lighting, sound, pacing, blocking, and editing are all things that can be showcased with or without the entire story. Deadlines are a part of the real world and dealing with them is a skill in and of itself. Of course, some are going to better than others at disguising the fact that it was originally a longer piece, but that's only one aspect of the process. Comment on that in your review and move on to giving the rest of your proper, clean, and distinctive review. I would hope that we as filmmakers would want comments on all aspects of the process, not just a Siskel and Ebert thumbs up or down.
I haven't watched all of the entries, but were there so many that weren't "horror" that it's worth getting upset over? Have we been so inundated with incorrectly themed entries that it overshadows the proper horror films? No. Perhaps users here wanted to be involved in the festival and loosely interpreted the genre. That's fine with me.
-Ryan
ahahahahahahahahahahahahah! lol!was that a tear I saw Movie Master???