KRONSTADT films
Member
Hello,
I keep watching and comparing the HVX200 footages with DVX100 footages. Especiallly how both of them work with Adaptors (well, quite frankly I havn't managed to find too many footages shot with HVX200 with adapters like Guerilla35 or Letus35)
But there is this nagging thing that keeps comming back about the HVX200: the GREEN !!!. I mean, it is just me or did any of you notice it as well that HVX200 responds to Green colour (like grass or trea leaves) in a very funny way... In comparrisson DVX100 seems to be fine with it and with proper adaptors and lenses produces "cinematic" images that can compare to cinema of 1990s (Reservoir Dogs, Naural Born Kilers, Pulp Fiction)- Beautiful.
But HVX's response to Green is just funny. It looks too bright and unnatural... even unpleasant to watch.
What do you think?
I keep watching and comparing the HVX200 footages with DVX100 footages. Especiallly how both of them work with Adaptors (well, quite frankly I havn't managed to find too many footages shot with HVX200 with adapters like Guerilla35 or Letus35)
But there is this nagging thing that keeps comming back about the HVX200: the GREEN !!!. I mean, it is just me or did any of you notice it as well that HVX200 responds to Green colour (like grass or trea leaves) in a very funny way... In comparrisson DVX100 seems to be fine with it and with proper adaptors and lenses produces "cinematic" images that can compare to cinema of 1990s (Reservoir Dogs, Naural Born Kilers, Pulp Fiction)- Beautiful.
But HVX's response to Green is just funny. It looks too bright and unnatural... even unpleasant to watch.
What do you think?