Well said MovieSwede.
Sony really trys to say something else when they place A1 as a "professional" cam. I was confused until I saw images of the FX1 and A1 side-by-side. There is no comparison. The FX1 is a clear winner.
Perhaps the only reason the A1 is called a "Professional" camera is that it has more options, such as XLR inputs, that are more likely used by professionals.
Besides, I wouldnt call the FX1 consumer (even though Sony does). It doesnt look consumer (its too big) it doesnt act consumer (its too complicated) and it sure doesnt perform consumer (it has the same chip as the Z1!).
Sony really trys to say something else when they place A1 as a "professional" cam. I was confused until I saw images of the FX1 and A1 side-by-side. There is no comparison. The FX1 is a clear winner.
Perhaps the only reason the A1 is called a "Professional" camera is that it has more options, such as XLR inputs, that are more likely used by professionals.
Besides, I wouldnt call the FX1 consumer (even though Sony does). It doesnt look consumer (its too big) it doesnt act consumer (its too complicated) and it sure doesnt perform consumer (it has the same chip as the Z1!).