J.R. Hudson
Spirit Animal
chromeboy007 said:John,
You certainly have a point, and of course, you are making generalizations. Aspiring filmmakers like us certainly would not fall into this trap, but the flip side of your argument is that the general public has a bad tendency to believe that "new = good". It's a fallacy that new movies have always taken the best of the past and have evolved into something new and better. The truth is it doesn't always happen that way. Even the Oscar best picture last year (Crash) sucks - it did not evolve at all... most characters are 2 dimensional caricatures and plot advances on coincidences and gimmicks and flashy transitions. These things awe the general public but do not fool us for a second.
Good cinema are the ones that, in addition to being innovative, have absorbed/learned from the old masters. Fortunately for us, in this fastfood/Paris Hilton era, film is an art where quality still means something. Definition of what good is varies but there is some true consensus. And good films are still being sort after. Look at pop music, it has descented to the lowerest depth ever with Paris Hilton's new CD. Old but good music is forgotten, for no other reason then because it is not new. There are talented musicians who will never get signed and noticed because of filthy social decadents like her. and that makes me very sad.
My point is, I would rather watch Seven Samurai for the nth time, or pick out a Fellini /Polanski/whatever that I haven't seen from the store, then to watch Superman Returns...
You said so yourself, the only modern filmmaker whos' work you truly can't wait to see is QT. what does that say about the general modern filmmakers?
For me it's Wong Kar Wai... I can't wait for My Blueberry Nights. the rest can wait....
My booze is wearing down....
That is a great take.