DVCPRO HD & The End of My Sanity

TheKingBanana

New member
Ok, I am little new to the HVX and I have lived on these message boards for the last month or so since I got my HVX. THANK YOU ALL FOR YOUR INFO. I must now call upon everyone for a little advice/help. I need help finding a real-live-honest-to-goodness- PROFESSIONAL NLE that actually WORKS NATIVLY with DVCPRO HD. As far as I can tell, all of the million and one OVERPRICED NLE's floating around are either retarded or cannot be considered professional in my book.
<p>
Example: Avid Xpress HD allegedly supports DVCPRO HD...I got my hands on a copy of this little gem of a NLE. Not only was the method of getting the clips to show up retarded but there is NO WORKING VIDEO preview with any video card except the Quadro ones from NVIDIA (I EVEN CALLED THEIR SUPPORT ON THIS ONE). OMFG I was 2 minutes away from buying this junkware when a friend of a friend lent me a copy to try it out. Thank God I didn't. My computer setup is as follows: Athlon 64 4400 (DUAL CORE), 2GB Ram, 1 Terabyte of HD space in RAID 0+1, Audigy X-FI elite pro, Radeon 1900XTX (512mb), 2X Widescreen LCD's, etc.
Drogar-Evil%28DBG%29.gif

<p>
So, I think you get the idea. Avid is not alone, almost every NLE I looked into either had no support for the format or didn't work correctly with current hardware & drivers. It gives me the impression that all of these NLE's floating around for $500-3000 are NOT what I would call professional. Being a decent DV editor for $2K is insane. I mean, who actually uses DV professionally to publish anything? That is what MOM & DAD film their kid's birthday with and make a cheap DVD with it. Hell, Pinnacle Studio does that great for $100. So why are these lack luster NLE's claiming to be professional when they don't actually support their products with regular updates to allow for newer drivers-formats-etc.:crybaby:
<P>
Aside form my frustration, I need real advice on this one. Buying more hardware is ridiculous and unwarranted. I refuse to consider a MAC as I will never convert my files to quicktime to edit them. Also, Mac hardware is pathetic in performance and costs twice as much. The only real option I have come across is EDIUS 4 "Broadcast". What, including DVCPRO HD was that big of a stretch to just include in the so-called PRO version. SO now I have to imagine this support for the format. I saw how Avid "SUPPORTED" it, and the DEMO Edius offers is not compatible with the "BROADCAST" features. Are you kidding me? You want me to blow another $1500+ for a program that I have to IMAGINE what it would be like to use it in HD? No option to download try/buy, only retail and distributors outlets at full non-refundable MSRP?:furious3:
<p>
What I need to know is what are you all using RIGHT NOW, that REALLY works. I bought this amazing $6000 camera to do SD? Hell no; if the whole P2 card for $600 for 4 minutes of footage debacle isn't bad enough, the lack of software support is MINDBLOWING. Is there not enough people actually using this camera professionally to justify good support? I just finished filming a music video in 1080/60I and I was trying to EDIT the footage. I had hoped the Xpress HD would have done the trick. Nope. So here I am, with 100+ minutes of pristine HD footage just dumped from my Firestore to my PC and I can't do anything with it. :kali:

PS: I need to work with the footage unconverted and pixel perfect to the original MXF. I want to master DVD's and have the original 1080 for blue-ray output down the line. Conversion of the files is not acceptable. Frameservers are not a real option and MACs are also out...thus I have just gone nuts.:badputer:
 
Raylight, Cineform, etc. are your options on PC, they will work with Premiere Pro and Vegas. Conversion does not mean degradation BTW, in actuality, DVCproHD is only a mediocre codec...



ash =o)
 
That's one reason, why I didn't buy an HVX yet ;)

First I need a working NLE-software for DVCPRO-HD and me personally, I'm waiting for Liquid Edition Broadcast that is supposed to support DVCPRO-HD and editing on the P2 card, but I wouldn't buy the camera BEFORE I know this for sure... If I'm lucky, coming other Liquid Edition versions could support DVCPRO-HD because the Broadcast version costs about 2000 Dollar, so that's about twice the price of Liquid Pro 7 ...

Apple isn't an option for me either and Edius hasn't all the features I like from LE.
 
True, conversion may be quality similar. But, everytime you change video format you will lose quality or at the very least many hours of your life you will never get back sitting & waiting for a transcode.
 
I 2nd robot. Get a new mac pro desktop... gonna kick some ass there. DVCPROHD seems like a sweet codec. Now HDV.. that sucks!
 
And mac has all the solution for P2. I don't think so. If you are a PC user, you're better off with Cineform, Raylight, P2 Genie.
 
Download the demo of Connect HD or Aspect HD from Cineforms website and try the conversion utility (HD Link). Ash is right, it's fast and no loss of quality. You can even convert right from the P2 card. If your computer is fast enough, it will convert faster than your computer can transfer from P2 to Hard Drive.
 
I was a long time P Pro user and still made the switch from XP to MAC and never looked back. Believe me its worth the investment. FCP and MacBook Pro are a match made in heaven. Zero issues with speed, compatibility, etc.
 
Sclark said:
I was a long time P Pro user and still made the switch from XP to MAC and never looked back. Believe me its worth the investment. FCP and MacBook Pro are a match made in heaven. Zero issues with speed, compatibility, etc.


...untill you erase your mxf files, and view your edited master only to find all the drop outs.... only the mac can do that, and it does it like a dv tape found in your beach swimtrunks.
 
I'm sorry but I still don't see your major issue with Avid. You take the MXFs and stick them in the Avid Media Folder. Then you get them brought up with the media tool. It's a hell of a lot faster than digitizing a tape. It also means that you are working with the pure, unconverted MXFs. What's the problem?
 
Or you import 'em straight off the card, you don't even have to copy them to the avid media files directory.

Anyway, if you're on the PC, nothing comes close to the P2 integration that EDIUS Broadcast offers. Actually, I can rephrase that: whether you're on the PC or the Mac, nothing comes close to the P2 integration that EDIUS Broadcast offers. If you want a system that acts like it was designed from the ground up to work with HVX/P2 footage, EDIUS Broadcast is by far the most integrated.
 
If you're not going to go the Mac-based route, then I'd really recommend following whatever Barry Green has to say about workflows on the PC.

OR... you can take a look at what Apple just annouced about dual dual-core workstations based on their Intel architecture. I just started working with the HVX on a dual G5 and it works smoothly. And $1000 in software gets you a very nice bundle of programs that do a lot in addition to editing: motion graphics, sound editing, DVD authoring.

There is the disadvantage of FCP having to generate Quicktime files, but I suspect that Apple will solve that problem soon enough. MXF files are part of the wave of the future and I can't imagine Apple not wanting to catch it.
 
DavidBeier said:
I'm sorry but I still don't see your major issue with Avid. You take the MXFs and stick them in the Avid Media Folder. Then you get them brought up with the media tool. It's a hell of a lot faster than digitizing a tape. It also means that you are working with the pure, unconverted MXFs. What's the problem?

I have to completely agree. P2 with Avid is a smooth piece of cake! Offload to the MeidaFiles folder (4 minutes WITH verification on a 4 minute HD card), open media tool in a project and drag them into a bin, and you are working absolutely native with real thing. NOTHING COULD BE EASIER. I've been doing it without the smallest aggravation for a while now, and it was just as easy the first time as it still is. P2 is DIFFERENT, not difficult, and with a few moments thought and a couple of simple moves, it is mastered on Avid. I think most of the grumbling I hear is the result of the newness of the P2 procedure. Work it for a week, and you will find it much smoother than tape.

Just stay away from mac and FCP, they are very much a jury-rig approach; I know, I use them both with my HVX in addition to PC, and AVID-PC is by far the more sensible. Not to say that Mac and FCP aren't good in their own ways, just a good long way behind the pack relative to P2.
 
DCSensui said:
There is the disadvantage of FCP having to generate Quicktime files, but I suspect that Apple will solve that problem soon enough. MXF files are part of the wave of the future and I can't imagine Apple not wanting to catch it.

I don't know about that. Apple seems deadset against MXF. A lot of us have been asking for a while that quicktime player support it and it still doesn't and they didn't announce native MXF support at NAB 2006 (not even a nice little, "we're working on it."). I think that Apple may see MXF as a PC format and refuse to support it on principle.
 
Originally posted by TheKingBanana
I mean, who actually uses DV professionally to publish anything?

Pretty much the whole world? HD isn't exactly the de facto standard yet.
 
Listen to Barry, and invest those 1500$ for Edius Broacast. I have a FireStore and Edius Broadcast too and I am still using version 3.61. Maybe you also own a Varicam or a Sony CineAlta, as Edius Broadcast supports these natively, too...
 
Back
Top