Is Sd Dead? Am I Wasting My Time Filming My Project On Dvx ?

You, zoostory, are not "the public."

Didn't say a thing about DV. It's not the same as SD.

No, I don't think they care that much. I'm sure most people look at HDTVs and are impressed, but go home and are happy as clams watching their standard sets. People who just have to have it are very rare.
 
It's the same mentality that think an LCD has a better display than a CRT because it is a "flat screen"...
 
zoostory said:
hmm. All of you that think the public doesn't care about HD are wrong. I have a 130" diagonal projection screen with a 720p projector as my main home TV watching system. HD look AMAZING ON IT, and you can clearly see the limitation of SD. After watching Deadwood at 130" in HD true 16x9, I'm never going back!

Plus, HD has a higher color sampling rate than DV. Even in the SD world, to be able to finish on something higher end, like digibeta, is better than miniDV. Also, a lot of festivals are now accepting HDCAM. Especially the big ones. And for a short film, festivals are probably the biggest target market.

There is a difference, clearly, and DV will not be around forever... nothing ever is.
Click to expand...

Not everyone is rich enough to own a digital projector home viewing system. I have come to the conclusion that SD while not better then HD is still very good. And the slighter dirtier picture gives a more film like appearance.

PIMP
 
I can buy certain agruments. But saying that a slightly "dirtier picture" in SD gives a more film like appearance is just absurd. 35mm is probably the highest resolution of all... and so... so different from anything shot SD. Also, the dirt you are talking about on film (gate weave, black, white dirt, mistimes, etc) is very, very different from any form of "dirt" any SD format will create. So no, crappy resolution does NOT give a more film like appearance, I don't care what you say. If you watch film telecined to HDCAM versus film telecined to Digibeta on a large projector, or even an HDTV, you WILL see a difference, and the HDCAM will preserve more filmic qualities.


Also, it is not the same mentality as saying an LCD is better than a CRT because... another absurd analogy. HDCAM actually HAS higher resolution and a higher color sampling rate, not to mention a natively 23.98 progressive nature. Whereas with your analogy, we are looking at two different concepts to present the SAME THING, with HD, we are looking at a concept for improving clarity and size.

Otherwise, why would Mann shoot with the Viper and Singer the Genesis? Why would most films be DI'ed to D5 if it was the same thing?

And also, my system cost 2500 dollars. That's for the screen, the projector, the HDMI cables, ceiling mount, AND the projector (including an extra bulb). It's amazing and far larger than any Plasma out there. The keys are light loss (room has to be dark for best image) and poistioning. While LCD projectors are more versatile than DLP, you still need to do some math and make sure you have the distance from screen, etc.

But I am so glad I did it! The World Cup in HD! Boxing, movies!

Those of you nay-sayers simply haven't seen the difference for a long period of time. Maybe a screen here or there in a Best Buy, but wait till you have 130" 16x9 diagonal at you house. I've seen both. And what I am saying is, once you go HD, it's very, very difficult to go back. And while it's true, most American's are passive and content... the most spent on commodity in America is consumer electronics, particularily home entertainment. Obviously, the studios and electronics companies are pushing various forms of HD. Trailers are now HD. The computer industry is pushing it. So it's coming, and it makes perfect sense. You can always down convert to SD if you love it's dirtyness so much :)
 
I was a very early adopter of HD, and at the time, even for years after, I was convinced you were right. You're still at the very early stages of your enthusiasm.

But people do exactly as you say -- they watch my set, they see sets at Best Buy, etc., and are impressed, but are perfectly happy with their SD sets.

Which is why I'm increasingly convinced that SD is "good enough" for the market.
 
David, it's not a question of whether SD is good enough for the market. Of course it is, the vast majority are not as passionate as us guys! But... look at it from the other perspective, the sales side of things. Companies need to keep selling. Right now the demand isn't high enough for HD, but the tech industry is doing everything they can to increase demand. The SD world is maxed out, there's not much room for new devices to sell people. Thus, HD. It is a growing market, and sooner or later some device or format will come out in the HD realm that will hit the right price point and availability, then boom, it will go widespread. That's what they are hoping with with HDDVD and Blue-Ray, but unfortunately their own war and their absurd prices are keeping people away from it.

Of course, we never totally know what is going to catch on or not. But technology is ever evolving and there will always be something new. And my bet is that that something will be of a higher defenition that what we currently have... if it is actually called HD or not, that can't predict.
 
HDCAM actually HAS higher resolution and a higher color sampling rate, not to mention a natively 23.98 progressive nature.
Click to expand...
the higher colour sampling depends entirely on the cam being used. The DVX is sd and shoots progressive.

Anyway for now SD lives and still has a solid place, of course in the future it will change. But to say it wont is akin to saying we will be driving around in combustion engine cars in 500 years.

I plan on jumping ship to HD in the very near future for my personal stuff. Everything at my house is HD capable, except of course the DVD player. We have a 42" plasma and 36" LCD both connected to HD Cable. I would say Japan at this stage would have the highest per capita uptake of HD, and still many people are without it, though many homes are now Digital TV capable.

On a side note the 36LCD TV we have is a month old and was clearly top one or two on the shelf at this size. Put it next to the plasma......... plasma wins hands down for clarity.
 
Last edited:
I am very happy this discussion is kept alive
since it includes updates on market demands ,
tech data about the viability of the dvx100 a
as well as subjective issues ,

i am about to launch several web based game movies and some other work done on a combination of dvx100a and 35mm film .

I have one hopefull assumption ,

Based on the Sticky Thread started by the man from Pine Lake Films -
I assume the unprez procedure put the dvx100a somewhat back into the HD MARKET in terms of output results .

I could be wrong about this assumption as uprezed standard def footage has a very contrasty quality to it.

Any opinions, on uprezed standard def dvx100 foootage as a competitor to real high def footage , are well appreciated ,
Cheers
Bruce
 
As far as I know nothing is actually screened in an SD format that is higher than 4:2:2 (DigiBeta). And, if specifically talking about the DVX in America, then it's 4:1:1 and in this day and age, to me, that's just not enough. On a big HD projection or plasma, it just looks chunky to me.

As for the other post, I don't know if I would put the DVX back to back with 35mm film, unless I had a real good reason to. Putting it near film will call out all the flaws of the format more. Students at the school I go to tried to use DVXes for "digital pick-ups" on their 16mm projects last semester, and it was really, painfully obvious, what was what.

I know there is InstandHD for uprezzing SD to HD, I haven't checked it out yet, but I can't imagine it is anywhere near the quality of originating on HD.
 
Regardless of the actual image quality between SD and HD, here's one other note: I know someone who has a completed film shot on DV and has been trying to market it to distributors (this is his 3rd film). No distributor will accept DV anymore, they are only looking at HD/HDV now. If you show up with 4x3 DV, they aren't interested.
 
Barry_Green said:
November, Murderball, 9 Songs, Mad Hot Ballroom, The Aristocrats, Lonesome Jim, and I'm sure there were others.
Click to expand...

Apparently some distributors are interested.
 
Well, yeah, but egearbox has a point. If you tell people your project was shot on 4x3 SD DV, that's a great way to get the door slammed in your face. Of course, if you tell them you shot on HDV that'll get it slammed just as quickly.

Ideally you wouldn't tell 'em what you shot it on at all. Just have them watch the project, ideally in front of a paying audience. If a paying audience loves (and emphasize LOVES) your film, then the distributor will see the market potential regardless of what format it was shot on. In the end the distributor doesn't care about your artistic vision, doesn't care about the moral message, etc., the distributor is in the business of distributing successful pictures. If an audience will buy a ticket to your film, and if they'll buy the DVD when the DVD is released, then the distributor will pick it up. It's pretty much that simple.

And Lonesome Jim had Steve Buscemi in it, and The Aristocrats was from Penn & Teller and had dozens (if not hundreds) of name comedians in it, and November had Courtney Cox Arquette in it, so those weren't total no-name indie pix. And Mad Hot Ballroom and Murderball were documentaries, and very well-received -- Murderball went on to win the best cinematography award for a doc at Sundance, and then was nominated for an Oscar for best documentary.

The moral of that story is -- regardless of format, you've got to "bring it" or you won't get anywhere with any distributor. But if you do "bring it" then the format won't necessarily stop you. Although better formats do make it easier, or at least they help you get past one layer of resistance.
 
I am wholeheartedly agreeing with most of you here. I just shot my first feature on the DVX, and I'm aimed at a direct-to-DVD distribution. I won't tell anyone what its shot on if I don't have to. And I am banking on the story, and the film itself to sell itself. If nothing disqualifies it, then its not any less important. Some films were shot on less and made more (Blair Witch Project). I will look into shooting our next film (hopefully a sequel to the current one) on HD.
 
If any distributor asks what your project was shot on before they look at it and uses that as a criteria to pass then that is not a distributor you want. Every day there is a new show or series shot on the DVX in SD.

There are more of them today, not fewer of them. I remember as a kid in the 1960's that everybody said in a few years we would have no need for food because it would all be in pill form, that all telephones would have a TV screen, most cars would fly and the list goes on.

Yes, things are slowly going to high def. But that is slowly. SD or SD uprezed is still a viable medium.

The truth is if people are looking at the pixels, then the real problem is what you shot content wise not what you shot it with.

Go and take a look at Murder Ball, Mad Hot Ballroom etc., compelling story telling shot on a DVX.

Even better, rent My Date With Drew. Theatrical release and big money maker, then DVD sales and I just saw it on broadcast network. Standard def, consumer grade camera, in camera crappy mike and no lights.

I saw it on a huge theater screen and in about two minutes I was hooked by the story and didn't notice grain or lighting or sound.

How many HD projects don't get distribution? I bet the exact same ratio as SD. Does anybody say "Oh, you shot in HD, OK, we don't need to see it, we'll just get the contract ready". No.

Shoot with the best you can afford no matter what it is and then work on content. If you have a DVX 100 anything then you are one step above most of the shooters out there right now.
 
Last edited:
PIMP said:
Should I stop filming my project and save for a HVX? Or can we still make the DVX 100 work in a world of HI DEF. I want to know from all you people if you find the dvx footage acceptable in this hi def field?

thanks

PIMP
Click to expand...
Hey,

IMHO I'd say no. A lot of great features were shot on this camera. I am shooting mine on this in either 24/30p. A great camera to use to get a "film look".

Go with it.

Chris
 
PIMP said:
Should I stop filming my project and save for a HVX? Or can we still make the DVX 100 work in a world of HI DEF. I want to know from all you people if you find the dvx footage acceptable in this hi def field?

thanks

PIMP
Click to expand...
Hey,

Something else you should know The DV Shop www.dvshop.ca says the DVX is their top selling camera even in the world of HDV. It's like the Energizer Bunny it keeps going and going and going...

It's the best SD camera under $8000.00 period.

Chris
 
Brandon Rice said:
I am wholeheartedly agreeing with most of you here. I just shot my first feature on the DVX, and I'm aimed at a direct-to-DVD distribution. I won't tell anyone what its shot on if I don't have to. And I am banking on the story, and the film itself to sell itself. If nothing disqualifies it, then its not any less important. Some films were shot on less and made more (Blair Witch Project). I will look into shooting our next film (hopefully a sequel to the current one) on HD.
Click to expand...
Brandon,

Your DVX looks cool! Which version do you have?
 
Barry_Green said:
Of course, if you tell them you shot on HDV that'll get it slammed just as quickly.
Click to expand...

Ive heard so many projects right now being shot on the XL h1. Im not saying your wrong, but just asking the question again... do you really think a distributor would pull the plug because of this fact? Wouldnt it mostly depend on how its finally output? Sorry Barry just an important question Id like answered at this point in time based on what I am doing.

Kelly Olsen said:
"Oh, you shot in HD, OK, we don't need to see it, we'll just get the contract ready".
Click to expand...

LOL! :Drogar-BigGrin(DBG)

However I do feel if you can put the fewest limitations between you and the distributor surely it has to mean something in the end.

BTW Brandon your story does look interesting from the trailer.
 
imageonepictures said:
Brandon,

Your DVX looks cool! Which version do you have?
Click to expand...

The Original baby... DVX-100 :)

ncje said:
BTW Brandon your story does look interesting from the trailer.
Click to expand...

Thanks! I sure think it is, can't wait to cut a more extensive trailer :Drogar-BigGrin(DBG)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top