HVX 35mm Adapter Quest

I looked at both at NAB though not side by side. At the P+S set-up I talked to a guy who had designed part of the P+S unit.
He prefered the Redrock & owned one.
I saw some halation in the P+S image from a bright light and didn't see it on the redrock but the lights were different so it was not a scientific comparison.

I did order the Redrock - though still waiting for it.
 
There has been a review comparing the P+S and M2.
http://www.showreel.org/memberarea/article.php?172

part of it states:
Cine adaptors

Taylor Wigton: Regardless of how great the off-the-chip quality of these cameras is, until the problem of poor optical performance is resolved – and as long as the physical limitations of a tiny chip equate to near infinite depth of field – a lot of pros, particularly those working in drama, are going to steer clear of them. The ideal situation would be for there to be a healthy market in dedicated 1/3in chip lenses, and hopefully this will come. But for the time being, the only viable solution is to use better quality optics designed for S16 or 35mm stills and cine cameras.

There are a number available, and even though they may not be optically perfect, they are also likely to increase in quality daily. With the prevalence of 1/3in HD cameras, cine adaptors are likely to be used by anyone from prosumers to top cinematographers.

The three units we brought on set for our second round of tests were: the Movietube from South London Filters in the UK, the P+S Technik Mini35 and the Red Rock Micro M2. We had previously looked at the Cinemek (Guerilla 35), but in the form we saw it, it still needed work.

When attaching these units to the front of the cameras, it is worth noting that the cameras’ existing lenses (where required) remain at a fixed focusing distance (basically, they are used to focus the image that passes through the 35mm lens on to the ground glass inside the cine adaptor, then on to the 1/3in CCDs. This means all focusing 'in the field' is carried out on the cine or SLR lens you use, so weaknesses in focusing control inherent in the lenses supplied with the cameras is no longer an issue. Similarly, because the supplied lenses don’t change focal length, this also overcomes any breathing issues. However, I don't want to oversimplify the cine adaptor situation, as they can require some training to get the best results.

Movietube: The most impressive unit from a construction standpoint is the German-made Movietube supplied to us by South London Filters in the UK. It looks like it was made by the same team who constructed the ArriCam series of 35mm cameras. The Movietube uses a patented static film screen rather than ground glass, and it seems so well protected that you feel it would take a shoulder-fired missile to crack it open and get dust and hair into it. The Movietube is a 35mm adaptor that can only be used with fixed lens cameras at this point, making it suitable for the Sony Z1 and Panasonic HVX200. When a 35mm lens is attached, the iris has a minimum stop of T5.6 before the ground glass can be seen, making it a solid yet limited system (although I know Rodney would rarely stop down further than this). I would happily combine this with the HVX200 at 60fps if I were shooting a commercial or music video and wanted both shallow DOF and high frame rates (as the HVX offers variable frame rates). I would also use it in any environment where there was a possibility of being knocked about.

The current limitation is that the Movietube would not allow me to use the entire range of T-stops, so while I could achieve a shallow DOF (at T1.2 the DOF is a focus puller-challenging 2in), it would be difficult to shoot wide DOF shots using the same optics.

Mini35: At $10,000 without 35mm lenses or any accessories, I was certain the P+S Technik Mini35 would be able to demolish even 2/3inch HD cameras. Like the Movietube, it has the advantage over the other adaptors of shooting an upright image, whereas with the other two the viewfinder (and footage) has to be flipped. This isn’t that much of a problem to overcome, though, and hopefuly the camera manufacturers will add ‘flip’ functions to their cameras sooner rather than later.

The Mini35 was kindly loaned to us by Eric MacIver of Indie Rentals in LA, who also supplied us with a set of Zeiss Superspeeds to test with the Movietube. Given how impressive the HDV images alone were proving themselves to be – even without the results pouring in from Canon XL H1’s HD-SDI-out, which bypasses the MPEG2 encoder and sends out 4:2:2 10bit HD at 100mbs – the first year of 1/3inch HD was looking menacing when you put the P+S Technik into the picture.

We did find one or two issues, though. First, you have to be aware that the Mini35 loses quite a bit of light. In addition, with the HDV signals we could detect the oscillating movement of the ground glass grains – this swirling was most noticeable in the dark areas of the frame, but becomes discernible in the lighter areas the further the lens is stopped down. This was evident even before we captured to tape, as we were looking at live component-out images, so we fervently hope P+S can fix this – and soon.

M2: This $500 unit was something of a shock. Who would have thought an engineering genius from Texas could design and set in motion a patent for his M2 adaptor that is actually quite suited to drama – and which is designed to work with old Nikon and Canon SLR lenses, of which there are legion sitting round the world gathering dust since the advent of digital photography, but which still feature exceptionally good optics?

The Redrock M2 is the only 35mm cine adaptor that exhibits a nearly lossless resolution and no image degradation, as there are no visible grains to throw a wrench into the MPEG2 HDV encoder. There is no artifacting and no soft edges.

The M2 can be notched down to T16, and I have even closed down to T22 with a Nikon 80-200mm SLR lens. No grain visible, no breakdown from MPEG and grain battling it out, and no visual loss of resolution.
 
There are a number of HVX users out there with the 72mm achromats incoming. You folks will be very happy with what you see.
 
=Prodigy= said:
Haha yes. I think the $10,000 difference is enough for me. If I had 10,000 for a 35 adapter, I think i'd just save it for the (possible) red camera.


1) I don't really care about the price difference since I can charge the hell out of customers for it and I already have 4 rather new Arri/Zeiss Digi lenses that cost way more.

2) I already have serial #119 on reserve for the red.

OAN: After reading the posted review (thank you) I ended up ordering the M2 kit with the PL & Nikon adapters... it will go nicely with my Cavision matte box.

Marque
Barnstormer Films
 
BarnStormer said:
Has anyone done a side by side comparison between the P + S Technik and the RedRock M2? Because honestly that would be what would sell me.

~MD

I just received my M2 and shot just few run and gun. Absolutely amazed, much sharper than Mini35 (that I tried twice) and equal or maybe nicer "bokeh". Used both with DVX.
 
Dan is finally coming to the table with the MPIC, now called Felix. Should be this summer.

He has mentioned that he is shooting to have the system with rod support for somewhere between $1200-1500, give or take a bit.

Dan builds some amazing tools and everybody should be pleased with what they see.

His site is tough to navigate (he's going to be doing a new site soon) but you can check it out for basic info on the MPIC. Here's a link to some images of what Dan is up to. In the gallery are pics of his follow focus and a version of the Felix (MPIC).

http://www.care2.com/c2c/share/detail/125072

www.dandiaconu.com

With a little luck this is really going to happen and I'm happy to see it.

J.
 
BarnStormer said:
1) I don't really care about the price difference since I can charge the hell out of customers for it and I already have 4 rather new Arri/Zeiss Digi lenses that cost way more.

2) I already have serial #119 on reserve for the red.

OAN: After reading the posted review (thank you) I ended up ordering the M2 kit with the PL & Nikon adapters... it will go nicely with my Cavision matte box.

Marque
Barnstormer Films

I wish I had your resources. :)
$9,500 is night and day for me. I don't even pause to fathom the thought of being able to drop that on a 35mm adapter. Nice lenses by the way...

-Jealous Prodigy
 
Back
Top