Mike Poindexter
Active member
And how many years (or months) until we are are back to filming 4:3 for distribution to primary viewing on video iPods?
Internet distribution of HD just isn't going to happen any time in the next 5 years. Even if the bandwidth was there, it wouldn't be there for everybody. I have friends who still cannot get broadband outside of satellite connections.
For all the talk about HD-DVD being dead, I just don't see it. It just came out and while it isn't just going crazy, the players are sold out almost everywhere. HD-DVD has the ability to offer hybrid films and retailers wouldn't have to stock more than one title. Backward compatibility is worth something. I have a lot of SACD titles I cannot play on a regular CD player, so if I want to listen to it in my car I have to buy it again. What's up with that crap?!
As far as being able to copy the data elsewhere, managed copy is in the spec for both HD-DVD and BluRay. I am happy about that, as I have a ton of money invested in my Kaleidescape system and look farward to putting more HD content on it. Hollywood knows consumers want to play content on different units - they just want to get paid more to let you do it.
Porn won't have any weight in this format war. They helped launch home video and the internet into many homes because they removed the stigma of going to public places to get your videos. HD-DVD won't offer that advantage because they can already remain anonymous with today's delivery system.
Solid state is certainly the wave of the future for capture. Archiving will probably stick with discs because that will be cheapest in the long run. Either way, whichever format has the lowest $/GB ratio will win the archive war unless they are close and then it will go to reliability, size and convenience.
When it comes to backing somebody in a format war, I have a hard time believing Sony will win. It is sort of like rooting for the Italians in a war. I have been burned by Sony in many formats - BetaMax, MiniDisc, Hi8, Digital 8, SACD. In fact, I cannot remember a format war Sony has won, can you? Past history doesn't guarantee future results, but from what I have seen in the past I wouldn't put money on Sony unless I got some good odds.
Sadly, I think each side has just enough clout to torpedo the success of the other side. I would have hoped that the industry would get together and create one format, but they did just that and they came up with HD-DVD. The BluRay camp broke ranks and decided to do their own thing. That same thing happened with DVD when DiVx was formed. I purposely wouldn't buy anything that could play DiVx even if it was cheaper. I had no intentions of supporting the group that couldn't work toward giving us one format.
Now BluRay is the new rogue player and I won't give them a dime of support as long as there is a format war. It is a principal thing for me here.
Internet distribution of HD just isn't going to happen any time in the next 5 years. Even if the bandwidth was there, it wouldn't be there for everybody. I have friends who still cannot get broadband outside of satellite connections.
For all the talk about HD-DVD being dead, I just don't see it. It just came out and while it isn't just going crazy, the players are sold out almost everywhere. HD-DVD has the ability to offer hybrid films and retailers wouldn't have to stock more than one title. Backward compatibility is worth something. I have a lot of SACD titles I cannot play on a regular CD player, so if I want to listen to it in my car I have to buy it again. What's up with that crap?!
As far as being able to copy the data elsewhere, managed copy is in the spec for both HD-DVD and BluRay. I am happy about that, as I have a ton of money invested in my Kaleidescape system and look farward to putting more HD content on it. Hollywood knows consumers want to play content on different units - they just want to get paid more to let you do it.
Porn won't have any weight in this format war. They helped launch home video and the internet into many homes because they removed the stigma of going to public places to get your videos. HD-DVD won't offer that advantage because they can already remain anonymous with today's delivery system.
Solid state is certainly the wave of the future for capture. Archiving will probably stick with discs because that will be cheapest in the long run. Either way, whichever format has the lowest $/GB ratio will win the archive war unless they are close and then it will go to reliability, size and convenience.
When it comes to backing somebody in a format war, I have a hard time believing Sony will win. It is sort of like rooting for the Italians in a war. I have been burned by Sony in many formats - BetaMax, MiniDisc, Hi8, Digital 8, SACD. In fact, I cannot remember a format war Sony has won, can you? Past history doesn't guarantee future results, but from what I have seen in the past I wouldn't put money on Sony unless I got some good odds.
Sadly, I think each side has just enough clout to torpedo the success of the other side. I would have hoped that the industry would get together and create one format, but they did just that and they came up with HD-DVD. The BluRay camp broke ranks and decided to do their own thing. That same thing happened with DVD when DiVx was formed. I purposely wouldn't buy anything that could play DiVx even if it was cheaper. I had no intentions of supporting the group that couldn't work toward giving us one format.
Now BluRay is the new rogue player and I won't give them a dime of support as long as there is a format war. It is a principal thing for me here.