rawfa
Veteran
That was exactly what I meant. With todays' technology you can go a long way with any powerful enough camera. And by the way, the "videoclub" shot posted by Macregor was not CC and it has an amazing film look. No doubt progressive is WAY better for narrative projects (actualy, IMO, it's always better), but lets not fool our selves thinking that progressive is all there is to "film look" and to achieving great cinematic results. You show a feature film shot with the Z1, the HVX, the GY-HD 100U, the XL H1 to the general public and nobody is going to be fooled it's film no matter what. There are SO MANY factors. If you have any of these cameras you have a truly amazing tool at your disposal and you cannot blame it on the camera for bad results. You CAN make amazing things with ANY of these cameras. Great things were made with non-HD cameras (one that comes to mind is "28 days later", shot on a XL1 and "Land of Plenty", shot with a dvx...and there's a bunch more).