Mattykins
Cute Member
Not true. We're in a flooded market now. When 28 Days Later came out (2002) everything was SD anyway and HD was still to be desired by consumers and prosumers. In 2004/5 we got a slew of HDV/HD cameras. Now a kid with an HV20 and the right set up with the right amount of grey matter can make a great action film. I've seen some stuff on here done by young college guys just for fun that trumps my first film in "slickness" (camera movement and angles and looks).
I don't know how you think that is even possibly true. Yes - anyone can pick up a consumer camera and shoot. But you completely took your argument and flipped it on itself. It's easier for someone to get an HDV camera now and make HDV footage than it is to go SD in many ways. Everyone wants HDV on the consumer level.
But in the same stroke Hollywood is also using these consumer cameras. Look at crank 2.
So under your argument, an action film shot on a DVX won't go anywhere but the same film shot on the HVX will? Format doesn't matter. Maybe for final print - yes. In which case film can be seen worldwide. Whereas digital exhibition is only really in it's very infant states.
Just because a film was shot HD doesn't inherently make it better. I've seen footage from a RED. 4K (well - under 4K, but whatever) that looks like crap. I've seen stuff on 16mm look like crap. I've seen DVX footage look like crap. I've seen DVX footage look amazing. And XL2 footage look amazing. Cameras really mean nothing. Aside from the level of control.
Look at the new HD channels. Makeup and set design crew nightmare. They need to work harder than ever to pull off sets and costuming. Just because it is HD doesn't make it look any better.
Acquisition format will not matter. The only differential is film verses digital. SD verses HD doesn't make any difference in exhibition. Unless of course you are talking about a transfer for film.