NorBro
Major Contributor
Just one last note, in general, about the dB and what not; I'm talking about the input sensitivity directly related to preamps.
If you look at a mic's specs, say, the CS-3e, it's a very sensitive mic but it's also very directional, so the general sensitivity of "I pick up everything in the room" and signal sensitivity aren't related.
The Sanken is at -20dB which is really unbelievable. The famous 416 sits at a very good -33dB (but that's not -20dB).
Mics with a lower negative number are so forgiving for lackluster preamps (the CS-3e might be good at 4 or 5 on a camcorder, but the 416 might need 6-7 on the knob/thumb dial).
But, yeah, it did feel like those older cameras were thought about more (naturally at the time they were a priority).
Had a HMC150 and HPX250 and they were both solid with audio (at least from what I remember).

If you look at a mic's specs, say, the CS-3e, it's a very sensitive mic but it's also very directional, so the general sensitivity of "I pick up everything in the room" and signal sensitivity aren't related.
The Sanken is at -20dB which is really unbelievable. The famous 416 sits at a very good -33dB (but that's not -20dB).
Mics with a lower negative number are so forgiving for lackluster preamps (the CS-3e might be good at 4 or 5 on a camcorder, but the 416 might need 6-7 on the knob/thumb dial).
But, yeah, it did feel like those older cameras were thought about more (naturally at the time they were a priority).
Had a HMC150 and HPX250 and they were both solid with audio (at least from what I remember).
