Shinobi
Active member
Hey Guys,
I'm lookin for some opinions on a matter that I keep thinking about. A lot of people, including myself, write and produce short films in hopes it will lead to a feature length version of the short.
So here is the situation: I have some close friends in the process of doing just that. But they have written the script so that it ends "open ended". The movie builds up to one twist and then ends. The final line is "this is only the beginning" alluding to more to come. (in their minds in the feature length version) Nothing is resolved, no characters arc, but homeostasis is lost and then it ends. Its kinda like just Act I.
So my questions are: Is this normal? Should a short be able to stand on its own? Will the audience be let down with an open ended short, where a conflict is set up but nothing is resolved??
P.S. They are planning to show it to investors and send it to festivals etc..
I'm lookin for some opinions on a matter that I keep thinking about. A lot of people, including myself, write and produce short films in hopes it will lead to a feature length version of the short.
So here is the situation: I have some close friends in the process of doing just that. But they have written the script so that it ends "open ended". The movie builds up to one twist and then ends. The final line is "this is only the beginning" alluding to more to come. (in their minds in the feature length version) Nothing is resolved, no characters arc, but homeostasis is lost and then it ends. Its kinda like just Act I.
So my questions are: Is this normal? Should a short be able to stand on its own? Will the audience be let down with an open ended short, where a conflict is set up but nothing is resolved??
P.S. They are planning to show it to investors and send it to festivals etc..