My school was the same way and we didn't often have problems. On the rare occasion that someones phone went off in class (rare) the teachers were usually pretty cool about it by giving a firm but humorous rebuke.My school's policy is "Not seen, not heard, not taken away"
In college here I always turn my phone off or set it to vibrate when in class and most people I know do the same.
It seems that this might be an issue of treating the symptoms rather than the cause which is, inevitably, boredom. If it isn't a phone it's paper notes, calculator games or something else. The battle for students attention can't be won by fighting these symptoms. You must address the cause and then the symptoms will vanish.Well of course the cell phone itself is not the problem, but kids use their cell phones in class to pass notes rather than actually physically passing the notes. There lies the problem. Plus cell phones going off in class, but mainly it's the text messaging.
Since by your own description it doesn't appear that the activity disturbs the class as a whole in any real way (such as audible ringing interruping a lecture) the students who fail to pay attention will inevitably face the consequences of their actions. I see no reason to militantly fight this; You have to pick and choose your battles. Choices can't be made for others but you can prevent the choices of a few students from negatively influencing the others. That's the best you can get from strict authoritarianism (not using the word in a demeaning way here).
I do agree that the girl who chose the phone over lunch made her own stupid mistake but as for the general principle of charging students? Sounds dubious. I'd definitely want to know where that money was going and there is nothing wrong with that. All money spent by the school should legally be open to anyone at any time, upon request.
EDIT: All *records* of money spent by the school should be open. Obviously not the money itself.
Last edited: