Spec-Comm
DVXuser Sponsor
TwistedLincoln said:I agree. I get the impression that Spec-Comm's intent wasn't to raise the price for a model with RAID, it was to lower the price for those of us who don't need it.
Exactly!
David
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
TwistedLincoln said:I agree. I get the impression that Spec-Comm's intent wasn't to raise the price for a model with RAID, it was to lower the price for those of us who don't need it.
Ramjet1979 said:So, how about the added features, functionality that the dual p2 interface offers? Any comment on that yet Spec?
Thanks,
Jason
Randal N said:Hello David:
Is firmware something you can talk more about?
Being a mac user and not owing a pc, I always have to wonder about firmware upgrades. Will the cp3 require firmware upgrades?
And, if so, will I have to buy or borrow a PC to make that upgrade or will updates also be made available via downloading to a mac?
TwistedLincoln said:A speculation: perhaps the dual card interface doesn't have anything to do with hooking the Cineporter up to the camera. Maybe it has to do with hooking it up to a laptop...
How great would it be if the Cineporter could be hooked into two Cardbus slots at the same time, and transfer footage using the full bandwidth available to both slots? Offload time could be amazing -- certainly faster than offloading a P2 card.
And a thought about the bad news -- I'm guessing that the bad news will be that either the price will be going up, or a release date will finally be given, but it will be a while from now.
A question for Spec-Comm: When interfaced with a PC, will the Cineporter function as an external hard drive using Universal Mass Storage, or similar?
That would allow us to offload to a laptop running Linux, which would be an excellent ability that cannot be otherwise matched currently except by using the camera as a card reader (which keeps you from continuing to shoot).
mcgeedigital said:Glad I bought a Firestore for my immediate needs.
=Prodigy= said:If I were to get the single 160gig HHD model, is it more thin than the 360gig model, or is only one of the two slots utilized?
I would like to see a one HHD slim model vs, just a lighter but same dimensions as a 360gig double drive model.
Wow.... summer of 2007?
TwistedLincoln said:I'm sure this is wishful thinking at this point, but is the non-RAID model upgradeable to become RAID-capable, or are they different units entirely?
Also, are the hard drives loaded into some kind of caddy, or does the unit accept them directly? If they require caddies, are they available seperately?
The pricing for the individual drives is certainly decent, but it would be nice to have the option of getting drives elsewhere (in case yours are sold out, need one the same day, etc) in a pinch.
One last thing -- the batteries on the Cineporter are hot-swappable, but how does this help unless the Cineporter can provide power to the HVX as well? Otherwise, as soon as the HVX's battery runs out, you have to stop recording to change batteries, even if the Cineporter can go forever... Still nice to have for offloading, I suppose.
I'm very pleased with this news. If "Summer 2007" is the worst news that's coming, this is excellent...
Barry_Green said:Curious about this line:
Specifically, the reason I would want a redundant RAID setup is so that I could eject one of the hard disks and hand it to the client (encased in a proper $9 external USB enclosure, of course) and keep the other drive for safety/backup purposes. So does the line above mean that this workflow would not be possible?
Ramjet1979 said:Wow. I went out of town, and missed the big updates.
They all look like good updates, but as Barry mentioned, there isn't much point in having removable HDD's if they can't be accessed without the Cineporter (other than for hackers).
It's a long wait, but I will wait. It looks exciting, and I am anxious to hear some of these new details elaborated upon.
Thanks,
Jason
Sumfun said:David,
Thanks for keeping us updated on your development progress, and thanks for listening to our requests. I'm looking forward to getting my hands on a Cineporter soon.
Meanwhile, here's another request. One of the reasons for having removable hard drives is the ability to hand a disk to the client after the day is done. It seems that due to the metadata required in the RAID 1 process, the drives will only work in the RAID configuration. But how about implementing a function to de-RAID the drives while preserving the data on each drive? Could it be as simple as re-writing some of the metadata? This way, at the end of the day, we can just press a button, then hand 1 disk to the client and keep 1 for ourselves as backup.
Jennyparis said:2007 is appearing to be the Solid State Disk (SSD) Year.
Already several laptops have been announced with SSD.
(this US web kinda "New SSD Bazaar": www.dvnation.com/nand-flash-ssd.html)
These SSD are 150% faster than HDD, and are IDE & SATA compatible!
This means you could plug these SSD into CP-3 (CP-X?) :
- Weight reduction
- Size reduction
- Plug-ability
- More reliable (No RAID)
In Summer 07, the situation will favor the emerging SSD market and the NAND technology will probably fill the coming P2 with larger capacities (at a shorter pace).
Our MOVIes are MOVIng in the "no MOVIng parts" Era!
Johan_Lundberg said:I agree. The price difference seems to be extreme.
To get the same amount of recording time as one would using a 320GB RAID-1 version you only need a 160GB non-RAID version, which makes the difference between RAID and non-RAID $1200!
And then you can buy the additional 160GB disk for $300, which means the RAID-function / controller will cost you $900 by ítself! Ouch.
I guess alot of people will skip on the RAID version and instead go for the non-RAID maybe with an additional disk instead. Personally I think the RAID features are great, but if these prices are the actual and final ones I might very well decide I can find better use for those 1200 bucks.
Just my 2 cents.
Spec-Comm said:I'm glad that you bought the Firestore. We have always advocated that you should buy what's available to fit your current needs. And you did buy it from us right?
David
Ramjet1979 said:I didn't think about that with the dual card interface. That I would lose the ability to plug the cp into my lappys pcmcia slot and dump footage. Or, even more exciting the ability to potentially edit straight off of the cp, as you can with p2 cards. And the ability to write back to the "cards"(cp).
That is a feature that I will miss. "Mounting" the cp to my laptop via its p2 interface, and using it just as I would a p2 card with EDIUS. How difficult would it be to "re-implement" that capability? Would it be as simple as "giving a little slack" between the two cards of the dual interface? For example, the red and white ends of an rca cable. It v's off so there is a little room there. It is a "loose" connection, rather than the dual interface being a solid structure. Does that make sense?
Could it be something like that, allowing you to just plug in one of the "cards" into the laptop, or does the way the cp now functions with the dual interface require both "cards" to be used simultaneously?
The thing I love about the cineporter is that it would act just like a big p2 card, so to speak. It would be a bit of a shame to lose the ability to use it as such with my laptop.
That was a bit longwinded.
Keep up the good work, Spec.
Thanks,
Jason
Barry_Green said:FW800 should provide comparable functionality. Or gigabit ethernet.