CinePorter™ FAQ

Status
Not open for further replies.
TwistedLincoln said:
I agree. I get the impression that Spec-Comm's intent wasn't to raise the price for a model with RAID, it was to lower the price for those of us who don't need it.

Exactly!

David
 
So, how about the added features, functionality that the dual p2 interface offers? Any comment on that yet Spec?

Thanks,
Jason
 
Sorry guys, I've been traveling and I have to sit down and sort through all the posts and answer all your questions. This is going to take some time and I'll do it as soon as I can.

David
 
Ramjet1979 said:
So, how about the added features, functionality that the dual p2 interface offers? Any comment on that yet Spec?

Thanks,
Jason

Let's see if i can answer this one quickly Jason,

Most of the advantages are internal. Since we had to redesign everything to implement the removable drives, we had to change the interface card as well. With the dual design we can emulate two cards, which allows for longer playback capability through the camera, dust protection and we don't have to play "tricks" with the camera, so it doesn't matter if there is a firmware change, we remain compatible. It is also a better design and implementation of the CinePorter. It takes care of some of the problems we were still working on in the CP-2 and it's just a more robust design. There was something else, but I can't think of it right now.

We understand that this removes the "stackable" feature on the 2 slot cameras, but we thought it was worth it!


David
 
Randal N said:
Hello David:

Is firmware something you can talk more about?

Being a mac user and not owing a pc, I always have to wonder about firmware upgrades. Will the cp3 require firmware upgrades?

And, if so, will I have to buy or borrow a PC to make that upgrade or will updates also be made available via downloading to a mac?

There will be firmware upgrades. We believe that all bugs should be fixed ASAP and we will issue firmware upgrades frequently.

Unfortunately, a lot of the tools for firmware upgrades are for PC only. It is our goal to write a CinePorter Manager application for the MAC as soon as possible, however it will be a separate software effort and will likely not be available at the release. In the meantime you can burrow a PC or if you have an Intel MAC, set it up to also boot to Windows.

Rest assured though, that the functionality of the CinePorter will have full MAC compatibility from the start.

I'm sorry for the inconvenience.

David
 
TwistedLincoln said:
A speculation: perhaps the dual card interface doesn't have anything to do with hooking the Cineporter up to the camera. Maybe it has to do with hooking it up to a laptop...

How great would it be if the Cineporter could be hooked into two Cardbus slots at the same time, and transfer footage using the full bandwidth available to both slots? Offload time could be amazing -- certainly faster than offloading a P2 card.

And a thought about the bad news -- I'm guessing that the bad news will be that either the price will be going up, or a release date will finally be given, but it will be a while from now.


A question for Spec-Comm: When interfaced with a PC, will the Cineporter function as an external hard drive using Universal Mass Storage, or similar?
That would allow us to offload to a laptop running Linux, which would be an excellent ability that cannot be otherwise matched currently except by using the camera as a card reader (which keeps you from continuing to shoot).

Hi Tony,

The dual interface card is not for the laptop use, although a good idea. See my previous post.

I think you have figured out what the bad news is.

The CinePorter does mount as Mass Storage Device and is as universal as can be for most operating systems.

David
 
mcgeedigital said:
Glad I bought a Firestore for my immediate needs.

I'm glad that you bought the Firestore. We have always advocated that you should buy what's available to fit your current needs. And you did buy it from us right? :)

David
 
=Prodigy= said:
If I were to get the single 160gig HHD model, is it more thin than the 360gig model, or is only one of the two slots utilized?

I would like to see a one HHD slim model vs, just a lighter but same dimensions as a 360gig double drive model.

Wow.... summer of 2007?

Same size for both models. The upgrade is a firmware update and an extra HDD. No price has been set yet for the upgrade.

Summer will be here before you know it! :)

David
 
TwistedLincoln said:
I'm sure this is wishful thinking at this point, but is the non-RAID model upgradeable to become RAID-capable, or are they different units entirely?

Also, are the hard drives loaded into some kind of caddy, or does the unit accept them directly? If they require caddies, are they available seperately?

The pricing for the individual drives is certainly decent, but it would be nice to have the option of getting drives elsewhere (in case yours are sold out, need one the same day, etc) in a pinch.

One last thing -- the batteries on the Cineporter are hot-swappable, but how does this help unless the Cineporter can provide power to the HVX as well? Otherwise, as soon as the HVX's battery runs out, you have to stop recording to change batteries, even if the Cineporter can go forever... Still nice to have for offloading, I suppose.

I'm very pleased with this news. If "Summer 2007" is the worst news that's coming, this is excellent...

No caddies for the HDDs Tony. Caddies add a good bit to the price, they would make the unit substantially larger and the drives run substantially hotter. You can install the drives into a very inexpensive off-the-shelf FW, USB or E-SATA enclosure if you wish. The down side is the need for handling precautions. We are considering a docking station with multiple interfaces. Not in the time line until after the release though.

The additional drive pricing is LIST. So it'll be up to the dealers to set the street price. I understand about the want to be able to use other drives. We're not sure at this point of how to keep people from using drives that will not work well. The drives we will supply will be tested, certified and will have our Firmware so that they will be recognized by the CinePorter and aways perform well. We will do our best to keep a large stock.

I understand your question about the camera battery, but there is nothing we can do about that. We can on the CinePorter. :)

I think the release date is by far the worst of the bad news.

David
 
Barry_Green said:
Curious about this line:


Specifically, the reason I would want a redundant RAID setup is so that I could eject one of the hard disks and hand it to the client (encased in a proper $9 external USB enclosure, of course) and keep the other drive for safety/backup purposes. So does the line above mean that this workflow would not be possible?

Hi Barry,

Right now there is a copy utility in the Dual drive version that will allow you to copy a drive inside the CinePorter faster than offloading. We understand that this still takes time and the workflow you describe is the ideal and preferred method of operation. We are working on a way to "break" the RAID pair and quickly "finalize" the drives changing them to a format that can be used by other computers without the RAID controller. We believe that we will have this functionality by the time the unit ships.

David
 
Ramjet1979 said:
Wow. I went out of town, and missed the big updates.

They all look like good updates, but as Barry mentioned, there isn't much point in having removable HDD's if they can't be accessed without the Cineporter (other than for hackers).

It's a long wait, but I will wait. It looks exciting, and I am anxious to hear some of these new details elaborated upon.

Thanks,
Jason

Jason,

Even if we don't have a way to separate the drives in a RAID 1 configuration, one of the modes allows you to simply span them. It's not a RAID mode. The CinePorter simply records to one drive and then to the next. When the first one is full, you can replace the full one while recording. We also have RAID 0 for applications in high vibration and motion situations, such as in an airplane. This will allow faster throughput and with the CinePorter's huge Cache virtually guarantees no dropped frames.

David
 
Sumfun said:
David,

Thanks for keeping us updated on your development progress, and thanks for listening to our requests. I'm looking forward to getting my hands on a Cineporter soon.

Meanwhile, here's another request. One of the reasons for having removable hard drives is the ability to hand a disk to the client after the day is done. It seems that due to the metadata required in the RAID 1 process, the drives will only work in the RAID configuration. But how about implementing a function to de-RAID the drives while preserving the data on each drive? Could it be as simple as re-writing some of the metadata? This way, at the end of the day, we can just press a button, then hand 1 disk to the client and keep 1 for ourselves as backup.

That's the goal. It is possible. We just have to do it in a quick and safe fashion.

David
 
Jennyparis said:
2007 is appearing to be the Solid State Disk (SSD) Year.

Already several laptops have been announced with SSD.
(this US web kinda "New SSD Bazaar": www.dvnation.com/nand-flash-ssd.html)

These SSD are 150% faster than HDD, and are IDE & SATA compatible!

This means you could plug these SSD into CP-3 (CP-X?) :

- Weight reduction
- Size reduction
- Plug-ability
- More reliable (No RAID)

In Summer 07, the situation will favor the emerging SSD market and the NAND technology will probably fill the coming P2 with larger capacities (at a shorter pace).

Our MOVIes are MOVIng in the "no MOVIng parts" Era!

Upcoming Solid State drives is another reason we went with removable drives.

David
 
Johan_Lundberg said:
I agree. The price difference seems to be extreme.
To get the same amount of recording time as one would using a 320GB RAID-1 version you only need a 160GB non-RAID version, which makes the difference between RAID and non-RAID $1200!

And then you can buy the additional 160GB disk for $300, which means the RAID-function / controller will cost you $900 by ítself! Ouch.

I guess alot of people will skip on the RAID version and instead go for the non-RAID maybe with an additional disk instead. Personally I think the RAID features are great, but if these prices are the actual and final ones I might very well decide I can find better use for those 1200 bucks.

Just my 2 cents.

Please don't try to figure out some perceived marketing strategy. We are trying to please multiple markets and the pricing will just have to be what it has to be. Remember, you are not buying extra hardware, but functionality. It took dollars and time to implement them. We have also given up future dollars by making a removable HDD model. The extra HDDs at the price we're selling them to the dealers will not bring us much profit. We are providing them for quality control and the reputation of the CinePorter.

Buy what YOU need.

David
 
I didn't think about that with the dual card interface. That I would lose the ability to plug the cp into my lappys pcmcia slot and dump footage. Or, even more exciting the ability to potentially edit straight off of the cp, as you can with p2 cards. And the ability to write back to the "cards"(cp).

That is a feature that I will miss. "Mounting" the cp to my laptop via its p2 interface, and using it just as I would a p2 card with EDIUS. How difficult would it be to "re-implement" that capability? Would it be as simple as "giving a little slack" between the two cards of the dual interface? For example, the red and white ends of an rca cable. It v's off so there is a little room there. It is a "loose" connection, rather than the dual interface being a solid structure. Does that make sense?

Could it be something like that, allowing you to just plug in one of the "cards" into the laptop, or does the way the cp now functions with the dual interface require both "cards" to be used simultaneously?

The thing I love about the cineporter is that it would act just like a big p2 card, so to speak. It would be a bit of a shame to lose the ability to use it as such with my laptop.

That was a bit longwinded.

Keep up the good work, Spec.

Thanks,
Jason
 
Spec-Comm said:
I'm glad that you bought the Firestore. We have always advocated that you should buy what's available to fit your current needs. And you did buy it from us right? :)

David

No, but if it makes you feel better, I promise to only buy the Cineporter from you! :laugh:
 
Ramjet1979 said:
I didn't think about that with the dual card interface. That I would lose the ability to plug the cp into my lappys pcmcia slot and dump footage. Or, even more exciting the ability to potentially edit straight off of the cp, as you can with p2 cards. And the ability to write back to the "cards"(cp).

That is a feature that I will miss. "Mounting" the cp to my laptop via its p2 interface, and using it just as I would a p2 card with EDIUS. How difficult would it be to "re-implement" that capability? Would it be as simple as "giving a little slack" between the two cards of the dual interface? For example, the red and white ends of an rca cable. It v's off so there is a little room there. It is a "loose" connection, rather than the dual interface being a solid structure. Does that make sense?

Could it be something like that, allowing you to just plug in one of the "cards" into the laptop, or does the way the cp now functions with the dual interface require both "cards" to be used simultaneously?

The thing I love about the cineporter is that it would act just like a big p2 card, so to speak. It would be a bit of a shame to lose the ability to use it as such with my laptop.

That was a bit longwinded.

Keep up the good work, Spec.

Thanks,
Jason

Jason,

Did I say that you lost that capability? The connection between the two interface cards is completely flexible. We should have some real pictures soon. With the new design though, we may not implement that feature until after the release. Unlike FW 800 or USB 2.0, the interface card does not have a DMA connection to the drive controller.

David
 
Barry_Green said:
FW800 should provide comparable functionality. Or gigabit ethernet.

Barry,

You are correct. We don't have an Ethernet or eSATA connection right now, but we thought about it. The real beauty of the CP-3 is the ability to upgrade the side panel. I'll expound on that later.

David
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top