Opinions on the Fostex FR-2LE?

C

ChillaVision

Member
I think that for me a field recorder would be far more a luxury item than a necessity. And, while I don't see being able to afford even the likes of a Fostex FR-2 in the foreseeable future, something like the new Fostex FR-2LE might be do-able.

So, what's the expert opinion on the usability of this machine?

fostex_FR2LE.jpg

​
 
when it would be on the market might be some one will answer you :-)
dont think that recorder without tc is something even consider in our days for video production
you maybe will save now few$ but will spend twice on the syncing the dailies later - time is money - why waist it
 
Would anyone else ever consider a recorder without time code? I have yet to edit any video or audio, but for those of us on a budget, would it be be possible to sync at all by using clapper sticks?
 
Sure, its possible to synch with clap slates. Even with timecode, the snap of the sticks on a smart slate is a reasuring backup. That said, timecode really shaves time off the editorial process (time=money).

The timecode-enabled FR-2 is a good value. Even though I've been using mine primarily for effects recording, the TC card has come in handy. The TC option just makes it a more flexible unit.

Its nice to see that Fostex has redesigned the shoulder strap anchors for the FR-2LE. The self-unscrewing shoulder strap mounting lugs were a real bad idea on the FR-2.
 
of course it depends how much they are going to sell for - that determines where it is going to sit in the market next to the Sound Devices 702 722 744t etc range, which are excellent.
 
Obviously this machine isn't in the same league as the 702, 722, 744, etc., but then it's only a $500 recorder... at least that's what B&H is charging.

Here's the description that B&H gives:

The Fostex FR-2 LE is a 2-channel compact field recorder that records stereo or mono BWF or MP3 files to Type II CompactFlash or Microdrive cards with up to 24-bit/96kHz resolution. The unit features built-in phantom powering, editing functionality, and USB 2.0, allowing high-speed transfer to Mac or PC computers. A pre-record buffer ensures full-take recording with no inadvertant loss.

Key Features
  • 2-channel field recorder in Stereo or Mono on Compact Flash or Micro drive cards
  • Maps in the standardized, PC-compatible BWF file format FAT32 file system
  • Large bright back lit display and built-in phantom power for condenser microphones
  • Linear data recording with 24 Bit/96 kHz and compressed MP3 recording formats supported
  • Two-hour capacity on 4GB CF card with Stereo 24 Bit/96 kHz resolution
  • Pre-record buffer ensures full take recording with no inadvertant loss
  • USB data transfer to Mac or PC computers for further editing and post-production
  • Ultra-lightweight and compact for convenient field use

Clearly this won't replace a higher end recorder, but would it be suitable for occasional use for recording satisfactory video audio? I guess Oleg says "no" primarily because it lacks time code.
 
I guess the real question is, how does it compare to the FR-2. There are a lot of people that don't like the FR-2, and my guess would be that this recorder doesn't address the problems others had with the FR-2.

Bottom line: for just a little more $$$ you can get the Tascam HD-P2, which has a tc implementation (caveat-no TC out), and a robust set of features and many satisfied users and a good review in DV magazine. If you're just looking for a backup to your primary recorder, maybe the FR-2LE would be okay, but why not just get another P2? ;-)

Phil
 
It does have the same pre's as the FR-2, according to Fostex. For me, I don't like the fact that the play button is on the top. I hate that about the FR-2. When the thing is in a bag, its a ***** to play something back.
 
Are there enough features or improvements in performance that would make the Tascam HD-P2 worth twice the price of the Fostex? (Not arguing mind you, just asking.... I don't know anything yet and I'm stuggling to learn and understand. Sorry to have to ask qustions that must seem very elementary.)

The "play button" in the wrong place I can grasp. Bad. But maybe it's something I can learn to live with.
 
Well, if the picture is accurate, then the device is totally worthless in a bag. The screen is on the top, not the front where it could actually be seen. Not being argumentative here either, I'm just blown away by stupidity of vendors if this is really true.

Phil
 
If you want a compact 2 channel flash recorder with no TC I would look at the Edirol R9. It's a hundred buck cheaper too :) That is the market of recorder this Fostex seems to be aimed at.

Cheers
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top