Why was widescreen ever created in the first place?

movies always had "gimmicks" to differentiate themselves from other mediums. One of the earliest tries at widescreen was for the movie "Napoleon" in 1927 and they called it polyvision. They stacked three cameras to shoot it for widescreen, but then the director also went crazy and used different angles too. That means sometimes when you are watching it, there were 3 4:3 screens, each with a different angle of the action. The aspect ratio is like 4:1 or something ridiculous like that.

Coolest shot i remember from film class was three different angles of french soldiers marching, the left screen and right screens were tinted red and blue respectively, so you were literally looking at a french flag as you were watching!
 
Widescreen might be better for dramitic programs but for event video it blows. I am hating it.
 
I think we NEED widescreen. I say the wider, the better. When you have a wider picture, you can capture more. Try to film the heads of two people standing 2 feet apart in 4:3. You cant do it.
 
Prairieboy said:
In the movie theatres it was a way to compete with TV. When the studio owners were worried about loosing moola, they tried some things to woo the viewership. TO say they were different, and more value. That is why we have the much better aspect ratio!

I think this is similar to James Cameron's push for 3d is another way of dealing with DVD and giant HD TV's cutting into films theatrical grosses.
 
I know you're right, and that seems goofy to me

Have the boffo cinescope widescreen stadium seating premiere and based on those reviews and word of mouth, sell more hidef laser discs or whatever they come out with to sell or rent to the hidef market.

It's a little different than when folks thought the corner video store would be the death of going out to the theatre because back then it was a no surround sound 4:3 crappt TV analog tape situation at home, and now there is widescreen surround sound etc. .... but not at my house, not for a while at least.

But as long as the studio is making $ off the theatrical release and the dvd rental / sales, even as hi def grows in the market it doesn't seem like much reason to panic ... there's more of a chance that hidef home theatre could kill movies now ... but it doesn't seem likely to me.
 
This is why we have widescreen!

ws2hs.jpg



:)
 
Another reason for the aspect ratio of motion pictures becoming wider would be film quality and lens sharpness. With early tv and film the quality was so bad that fascial expressions could not be seen unless, the actors head occupied almost the entire frame, 4:3 allows a for a portrait with just enough background to give the hunt of location. As quality gets better, you can show more background while still containing a sharp subject.
 
Haha, that had to be the best reason (post #27) given throughout this whole thread.

-Kegan
 
BLUESPIDER said:
This is why we have widescreen!

ws2hs.jpg



:)



Welll that is one of the few times that framing a human is better in widescreen. Almost all other times it is not good.
 
Back
Top