imgentertainment@mac
The Reverend
Well I came into an ethical question today, and I wanted to get your guys opinions. I have been working on, and producing a documentary for the past year and a half. I can't really tell you what it is about yet, but will have a trailer up by the end of the month. But what I can tell you is that we are shooting in some high tension situations, with very interesting people. So part of the film and probably the main event that will carry the film from the climax to the end and bare all our conclusions is a fourth of July BBQ with the people we have been following throughout the Doc. So the ethics come into play as everything we have shot up to now has been what has happened in real life, nothing has been added or recreated. We have been shooting what is happening and only scheduling interviews as needed. So we have been totally 100% objectionable and journalistic. This is our intent; to petray the situation as it is happening and not influence it in any way. Now you can argue that by just having us there and with a big bad camera we are influencing the situation. And this is true. But we try not to as much as possible. So now we have this 4th of July BBQ. Now the people we have been shooting are very patriotic and very family oriented. So they are planning to have a get together with every body. But these people are very simple. So it will just be a BBQ with maybe a couple of sparklers for the kids, and one American flag. So here is my question. If we help by doing a little production design, by bringing a couple of flags, some red white and blue ribbons, and center peaces for the tables and some small flags for the kids. Have we changed the situation? Have we influenced the way these people would have celebrated? Are we making them look more patriotic then they really are? Have we now crossed the line of being objectionable? And now are whole goal to have a true journalistic peace of work is thrown out the window because we decided to make it a little better celebration and a little move visually stimulating to shoot? So is this unethical? Dose by bringing props that would maybe not be there normally just to enhance what they are already doing make it a false as a journalistic documentary, and now it is a work of fiction? I know we could argue both opinions of this into the ground and I have the last two days, But I want to know what you guys think.
Thanks Don
rogar-BigGrin(DBG)
Thanks Don