Ok this will sound pretty crazy.
Let's say you have one hell of a high quality computer screen. the resolution is immense and such.
And I were to do an animated film, puppets and shoot with with a high digital still camera. so the resolution is huge alone. I would set everything up frame by frame. All well photoshopped and what not. So the animation on screen looks fantastic.
And the picture looks amazing because it's high resolution. Usually when you convert it to the television, you lose a LOT of the quality due to the color difference.
But if you were to take a camera 35mm and put it in front of the screen. And use the right lense, the right configuration for it to shoot exactly what it sees. How good would it look? you shoot it frame by frame, rather then play the movie if you know what i mean.
So frame by frame you shoot the screen. You test a few seconds first to make sure it is not overexposing or under.
What do you think guys? I haven't heard a lot of people do it. I have tried it with 16 mm, just a few seconds and it looked promising(even though i made a few mistakes in configuring the shutter ans what not)
I mean a film camera shoots what it sees. So if what it sees is beautiful high quality imagery, shouldn't it look as good?
Let's say you have one hell of a high quality computer screen. the resolution is immense and such.
And I were to do an animated film, puppets and shoot with with a high digital still camera. so the resolution is huge alone. I would set everything up frame by frame. All well photoshopped and what not. So the animation on screen looks fantastic.
And the picture looks amazing because it's high resolution. Usually when you convert it to the television, you lose a LOT of the quality due to the color difference.
But if you were to take a camera 35mm and put it in front of the screen. And use the right lense, the right configuration for it to shoot exactly what it sees. How good would it look? you shoot it frame by frame, rather then play the movie if you know what i mean.
So frame by frame you shoot the screen. You test a few seconds first to make sure it is not overexposing or under.
What do you think guys? I haven't heard a lot of people do it. I have tried it with 16 mm, just a few seconds and it looked promising(even though i made a few mistakes in configuring the shutter ans what not)
I mean a film camera shoots what it sees. So if what it sees is beautiful high quality imagery, shouldn't it look as good?
