How much does it cost to hire a 3D animator for CGI work?

G

Gang_Green

Active member
I need to hire a 3D Studio Max animator to animate and render a realistic looking model of a car into a flying car for a commercial. -It shoudl look Just like what you would see in back to the future.

I need this person to take the model (which was already pre-built) of a futurisitc looking concept car and make it fly in and land. It needs to look pretty realistic altho if its only 95% realistic is fine. The total on screen time would be about 10 seconds. Most of that its just parked not moving.

Now I dont know anything about 3D CGI so I have some questions;

1) How hard is this to do?
2) How long would it take to do?
3) How much would it cost to hire someone to do it?

Thanks!
 
1.not terribly hard
2.more than 1-2 days
3. like everything else, it totaly depends. you could get some kids just graduating from some CGI schools to do it for hardly anything/nothin....or you could get a pro cg guy to do it for like 2500-5k a week...(divide that up by 5 and you will see the day rate)...could be less....could be a touch more.

i suggest you go to cgchannel.com or maybe cgtalk.com and post the job and see what you get.
 
I find its just as easy to approach this from the other direction as well... based on
what was said above, you can figure out what your budget can support and go
from there... I'd be in the $5000-6000 range right from the get go.

Turnaround would be 1-2 weeks.
 
Unless you have someone helping out with lighting, texturing, and rendering (and which 3D Max engine is the best for this??) you can count on a one man job either looking bad with fast results, or looking decent with SLOOOOOWW results. Best bet would be to hire an effects house. Prolly save you a little money too, and definately gonna save time.

You are definately looking at more than a week. Hell, the render time alone at 30fps X 10 with all the Antialiasing, Reflections, Motion Blur, Radiosity, Refraction, and various image effects is gonna be massive. A kickass (home) system streamlined to the gills MIGHT be able to kick out a frame every 4-8 hours. Maybe.
 
Last edited:
I donno about that.. all the freelancers I know, myself included, have renderfarms
at home.

The base model is already built. Rendering automobiles is now pretty much top
notch for all the renderers and becomes even easier if its not in a hard cyc, limbo
room set.

Wildcards are going to be source footage (if any), moving camera and the quality
of the source model.
 
Greggl said:
I donno about that.. all the freelancers I know, myself included, have renderfarms
at home.

The base model is already built. Rendering automobiles is now pretty much top
notch for all the renderers and becomes even easier if its not in a hard cyc, limbo
room set.

Wildcards are going to be source footage (if any), moving camera and the quality
of the source model.
Click to expand...


Good point.

What kind of systems do you have in your farm, and which app are you running? How long would 1 frame take with your setup, with all the extras on it?

As a lightwave user, when I think of rendertimes for photorealism, I get physically sick. :Drogar-BigGrin(DBG)
 
Im talking about Still camera, No motion.
Shot List:

1) Overhead angle Wide shot: Car Flies in and lands on pavement. 2-3seconds.
2) Front Wide shot: Car just sits there while actor speaks - 3 seconds.
3) CU: Driver seen inside of CGI car speaks - 3 seconds.
 
And you have someone to do the compositing already? Sounds like you're talking about more compositing than 3d work, really.
 
Rapier_100a said:
Good point.
What kind of systems do you have in your farm, and which app are you running? How long would 1 frame take with your setup, with all the extras on it?
Click to expand...

I'm running a mix of machines. Dualcore G5, 4 older 1.3 Athlons, 3 SGI
Octanes and an O2. Maya for 3d, my compositing is Shake and Avid's
Media Illusion which was their wanna-be Flame compositing package.

In general, I'm shocked if renders get to more than 30 mins a frame... I
avoid using '3rd party' renders for my freelance work. I do much more of my
work in the compositing stage, rather than rely on the 'expensive' tricks that
we're getting in the new renderers.
 
Rapier_100a said:
a frame every 4-8 hours
Click to expand...

this sound shocking. when this happens, do not continue the rendering (10sec=250 frames 250*8/24=83,3 days :)) the quality is set too too high.
Mostly the final format is 720*576 and if the car do not fill completly the frame you will not need to render 720-576 (if the car is a lot smaller you will be able to render it at half resolution, and at compositing you can scale it)
and you have to render only a car in the 3d software...
 
But you still have to match the lighting of the original plate and this can take a day or 2 in itself. If its an over cast day you have to make sure all your shadows match in softness and most likely you would be using a bunch or area lights which render slow. It wouldnt only be the car rendering either. You would have to do car render, shadow render, matt render, specular highlight render, and maybe atmosphere if its a hazy looking shot. HDRI would be the closest for matching the lighting but someone would have to create the image maps on set of the background plate shoot.
 
Greggl said:
I'm running a mix of machines. Dualcore G5, 4 older 1.3 Athlons, 3 SGI
Octanes and an O2. Maya for 3d, my compositing is Shake and Avid's
Media Illusion which was their wanna-be Flame compositing package.

In general, I'm shocked if renders get to more than 30 mins a frame... I
avoid using '3rd party' renders for my freelance work. I do much more of my
work in the compositing stage, rather than rely on the 'expensive' tricks that
we're getting in the new renderers.
Click to expand...

Greg, how do you handle passing renders off to the Athlons from your Mac? Are you running Linux on the Athlons and using mental ray and shakes command line render on them?

I'm trying to plan to do the same thing. I use a dual G5 for my workstation, but I would like to build a small render farm with some opterons for rendering. Any suggestions?
 
Aram Bauman said:
But you still have to match the lighting of the original plate and this can take a day or 2 in itself. If its an over cast day you have to make sure all your shadows match in softness and most likely you would be using a bunch or area lights which render slow. It wouldnt only be the car rendering either. You would have to do car render, shadow render, matt render, specular highlight render, and maybe atmosphere if its a hazy looking shot. HDRI would be the closest for matching the lighting but someone would have to create the image maps on set of the background plate shoot.
Click to expand...



That's pretty much what I was trying to say, but I didn't put it as well as you did.
 
Aram Bauman said:
But you still have to match the lighting of the original plate and this can take a day or 2 in itself. If its an over cast day you have to make sure all your shadows match in softness and most likely you would be using a bunch or area lights which render slow. It wouldnt only be the car rendering either. You would have to do car render, shadow render, matt render, specular highlight render, and maybe atmosphere if its a hazy looking shot. HDRI would be the closest for matching the lighting but someone would have to create the image maps on set of the background plate shoot.
Click to expand...

ye HDRI/IBL seems to be a good and very fast way (not for rendering, but for you)
and when I told render only the car--> do not have to render the background. so that is transparent-->a bit faster. of course you will need shadows etc. bit if you set the properties well it should not take so long.
anyway I give a maximum if 5 mins/frame to render. but usually takes 1-3mins.
 
Last edited:
oneinfiniteloop said:
Greg, how do you handle passing renders off to the Athlons from your Mac? Are you running Linux on the Athlons and using mental ray and shakes command line render on them?
Click to expand...

I only use the old athlon farm for maya and I use the built in renderer. I'm
really oldschool in that department. The overhead for mental ray and prman
are unnecessary for the vfx work that I do. They get much more use dual
booted as windows multiplayer game boxes than as a renderfarm :)

I also tend to rely on the free shaders that mimic the 'popular' looks like
GI, radiosity, etc. Hehe... there is a drastic difference in what will pass
as 'cool' in a 1K online still over a white BG and what looks 'cool' at 24fps
with atmostphere and lens distortions, dust, motion blur and matching
film grain or digital artifacts. Live action is all I do and its MUCH more
forgiving.

I launch with http://www.drqueue.org/ and Maya 5. Disney ran LSF
to manage their renders and drqueue is pretty similar from a user
standpoint.

The irix boxes run illusion and the standalone renderer as well as maya.
They are also set up as a shake 3 farm. The mac is running shake 4,
but its not set up to network render. Shake 4/MAC is what I've been
using as a roto tool more than anything else. The bulk of the comping
is done on illusion with a homebuilt fibrechannel raid feeding frames.

I've been a LW/3DS user since the early 90s. At that point I was getting
30 min/frame renders. I kinda still aim for that, but what I can pack into
that 30mins/frame is VASTLY more complex than back then. As I said, I
get MUCH more tricky in the comp than I used to.
 
Greggl said:
I only use the old athlon farm for maya and I use the built in renderer. I'm
really oldschool in that department. The overhead for mental ray and prman
are unnecessary for the vfx work that I do. They get much more use dual
booted as windows multiplayer game boxes than as a renderfarm :)

I also tend to rely on the free shaders that mimic the 'popular' looks like
GI, radiosity, etc. Hehe... there is a drastic difference in what will pass
as 'cool' in a 1K online still over a white BG and what looks 'cool' at 24fps
with atmostphere and lens distortions, dust, motion blur and matching
film grain or digital artifacts. Live action is all I do and its MUCH more
forgiving.

I launch with http://www.drqueue.org/ and Maya 5. Disney ran LSF
to manage their renders and drqueue is pretty similar from a user
standpoint.

The irix boxes run illusion and the standalone renderer as well as maya.
They are also set up as a shake 3 farm. The mac is running shake 4,
but its not set up to network render. Shake 4/MAC is what I've been
using as a roto tool more than anything else. The bulk of the comping
is done on illusion with a homebuilt fibrechannel raid feeding frames.

I've been a LW/3DS user since the early 90s. At that point I was getting
30 min/frame renders. I kinda still aim for that, but what I can pack into
that 30mins/frame is VASTLY more complex than back then. As I said, I
get MUCH more tricky in the comp than I used to.
Click to expand...

Interesting, this gives me something to think about it. I haven't gotten into much heavy duty work, but I can see times where I'll need some extra CPU power. Thanks for the insight, I'll have to look into this some more.

:thumbsup:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top