Green Hornet
Veteran
Barry,
I am waiting for the report of Canopus broadcast before spending any more money.
Adobe Premiere does not support the HVX200 unless you use ray light, which is too slow
Vegas does not upport the HVX200, unless you use raylight, which is too slow.
Avid cost more than the camera, to do it right.
Final cut requires the PC user (me) to buy new hardware. On the cheap, a mac mini, $600, and final cut studio $1,200. =$1,800
I think I would have a hard time doing that, mainly due to the mac mini, being the bare minimum machine to suposedly do this.
A full blown mac dual 2.0 gig set up like Barrys cost about $2,000, plus final cut studio $1,200= $3,200. Then the 20+ inch flat screen, and you're over the $4,000 mark. Not being a mac guy, that's a tough step to make to the end from a means.
I spent over 10 grand in the last 30 days on related items to the HVX200.
I can almost finish my workflow.
I just need to know if canopus broadcast is worth the $1,000 to allow me to use my 3 gig P4, 1 gig ram laptop, untill I can pick individual parts to build my dream system desktop.
For a guy like me, does it make the best sense to go Canopus to "edit now", to hold me off for 6 months untill either Premiere gets faster and supports the HVX200, or a better $2,000 solution comes along?
Don't get me wrong, I like the Mac, I just don't feel I will like it unless I spend $4,500 on it, and then I won't like it for the price.
Why isn't anyone talking canopus broadcast with it's straight editing of HD.
I am waiting for the report of Canopus broadcast before spending any more money.
Adobe Premiere does not support the HVX200 unless you use ray light, which is too slow
Vegas does not upport the HVX200, unless you use raylight, which is too slow.
Avid cost more than the camera, to do it right.
Final cut requires the PC user (me) to buy new hardware. On the cheap, a mac mini, $600, and final cut studio $1,200. =$1,800
I think I would have a hard time doing that, mainly due to the mac mini, being the bare minimum machine to suposedly do this.
A full blown mac dual 2.0 gig set up like Barrys cost about $2,000, plus final cut studio $1,200= $3,200. Then the 20+ inch flat screen, and you're over the $4,000 mark. Not being a mac guy, that's a tough step to make to the end from a means.
I spent over 10 grand in the last 30 days on related items to the HVX200.
I can almost finish my workflow.
I just need to know if canopus broadcast is worth the $1,000 to allow me to use my 3 gig P4, 1 gig ram laptop, untill I can pick individual parts to build my dream system desktop.
For a guy like me, does it make the best sense to go Canopus to "edit now", to hold me off for 6 months untill either Premiere gets faster and supports the HVX200, or a better $2,000 solution comes along?
Don't get me wrong, I like the Mac, I just don't feel I will like it unless I spend $4,500 on it, and then I won't like it for the price.
Why isn't anyone talking canopus broadcast with it's straight editing of HD.
Last edited: