Hi,
I'm trying to establish best workflow for shooting a short documentary with Canon 6D. I'm going to shoot H.264 (obviously) with ML and VisionTech profile.
I've read a lot on the best DSLR workflow, but I'm still not clear on some of the issues. The most common recommended workflow looks (as far as I understood) like this:
1) Open your footage in After Effects, change color depth to 16-bit/channel
2) Denoise
3) Dither
4) Export to ProRes or DNxHD
5) Edit
6) Apply LUTs and color correction (I might be getting this step wrong... and I'm not clear on the exact LUT process)
7) Export video to H.264
It all seems fine when there are just a few files to process, unfortunatelly - it's usually not the case. So how do you go about processing multiple files? I figured out two possible ways, but neither is really convinient:
Workflow 1:
a) Open footage in After effects, change color depth to 16-bit/channel
b) create a separate sequence for each clip,
c) apply denoiser to each clip (Denoiser II seems more convinient, as there's no need to create a profile),
d) dither
e) save the project and re-open it in media encoder (each sequence separately)
f) export all the files to ProRes 422(LT)
g) Edit
h) Apply LUTs and color correction (I might be getting this step wrong... and I'm not clear on the exact LUT process)
i) Export video to H.264
Workflow 2:
a) Convert all footage to ProRes (in media encoder)
b) Edit in Premiere
c) Apply Denoiser (again Denoiser II seems a better option, as there are some issues with Neat Video in Premiere CC) and Dither in Premiere, render each clip on a timeline
d) Apply LUTs and color correction (I might be getting this step wrong... and I'm not clear on the exact LUT process)
e) Export video to H.264
Second workflow seems easier, but I might be missing some important issues. Maybe there's another, better way to handle the process? I have to admit I feel that Neat Video gives me much better results then Denoiser II, but seems harder to integrate into the workflow (and is significantly pricier - it's 50USD for Denoiser II Academic [works in Premiere and AE] vs 163 USD for Neat Video [Premier and AE, 97 USD for Premiere/AE only]. Any thoughts on that?
Thanks a lot for all your input, I feel a bit lost at the moment .
I'm trying to establish best workflow for shooting a short documentary with Canon 6D. I'm going to shoot H.264 (obviously) with ML and VisionTech profile.
I've read a lot on the best DSLR workflow, but I'm still not clear on some of the issues. The most common recommended workflow looks (as far as I understood) like this:
1) Open your footage in After Effects, change color depth to 16-bit/channel
2) Denoise
3) Dither
4) Export to ProRes or DNxHD
5) Edit
6) Apply LUTs and color correction (I might be getting this step wrong... and I'm not clear on the exact LUT process)
7) Export video to H.264
It all seems fine when there are just a few files to process, unfortunatelly - it's usually not the case. So how do you go about processing multiple files? I figured out two possible ways, but neither is really convinient:
Workflow 1:
a) Open footage in After effects, change color depth to 16-bit/channel
b) create a separate sequence for each clip,
c) apply denoiser to each clip (Denoiser II seems more convinient, as there's no need to create a profile),
d) dither
e) save the project and re-open it in media encoder (each sequence separately)
f) export all the files to ProRes 422(LT)
g) Edit
h) Apply LUTs and color correction (I might be getting this step wrong... and I'm not clear on the exact LUT process)
i) Export video to H.264
Workflow 2:
a) Convert all footage to ProRes (in media encoder)
b) Edit in Premiere
c) Apply Denoiser (again Denoiser II seems a better option, as there are some issues with Neat Video in Premiere CC) and Dither in Premiere, render each clip on a timeline
d) Apply LUTs and color correction (I might be getting this step wrong... and I'm not clear on the exact LUT process)
e) Export video to H.264
Second workflow seems easier, but I might be missing some important issues. Maybe there's another, better way to handle the process? I have to admit I feel that Neat Video gives me much better results then Denoiser II, but seems harder to integrate into the workflow (and is significantly pricier - it's 50USD for Denoiser II Academic [works in Premiere and AE] vs 163 USD for Neat Video [Premier and AE, 97 USD for Premiere/AE only]. Any thoughts on that?
Thanks a lot for all your input, I feel a bit lost at the moment .