Originally posted by scorsesefan
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Sold my FS7 today
Collapse
X
-
"There is nothing permanent except change."
Heraclitus
www.liamhall.net
TWITTER: @WordsbyLiam
INSTAGRAM: @picsbyliam
-
Originally posted by NorBro View Post
P.S. The Blackmagic URSA was also released in 2014 and destroyed the FS7's IQ, but 90% wouldn't use BM in 2014 and YouTube wasn't like it is today, so no one knew."There is nothing permanent except change."
Heraclitus
www.liamhall.net
TWITTER: @WordsbyLiam
INSTAGRAM: @picsbyliam
Comment
-
The original BMPCC had some of the worse IR contamination there was.
Being an early adapter in 2013 (per usual), that camera probably was a science project at some points in time. Initially it didn't have simple features like a battery meter (you never knew when you'd run out of power, lol), and you couldn't format your cards in the camera (had to use a computer). Plus other things I probably don't remember any more.
The new cameras are much better after about 10 years of experience, naturally.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Liam Hall View Post
Yes, I've used an FX9 and A7SIII a few times. And, yes, quite good is how I'd describe it. We should all demand better than quite good though, particularly when there are cameras like the GH5 that create a very pleasing image at a fraction of the cost - horrid little camera though it is.www.VideoAbe.com
"If you’re really in favor of free speech, then you’re in favor of freedom of speech for precisely the views you despise. Otherwise, you’re not in favor of free speech." - Noam Chomsky
Comment
-
Originally posted by ahalpert View Post
I think I prefer the latest sony color science to the latest canon color science. At least in some modes/settings
Comment
-
I dont get the concept of 'liking' a colour science. You shoot a gretag card, (optionally apply the manufacturers LUT) and then colour pick the colours RGB values. Those values are then correct or incorrect as per the RGB values asigned to the card by its maker. End of.
Should you not like the look of correct do another node of artistic colour swinging.
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by morgan_moore View PostI dont get the concept of 'liking' a colour science. You shoot a gretag card, (optionally apply the manufacturers LUT) and then colour pick the colours RGB values. Those values are then correct or incorrect as per the RGB values asigned to the card by its maker. End of.
Should you not like the look of correct do another node of artistic colour swinging.
but sure, i've seen the results from RAW still files from different manufacturers and it's clear that you can get the same look from any camera. I think that with a thick file and some time to grade, the differences are immaterial. (Nevertheless, look at how useful Cinematch has been for people to match different cameras. That's a clear indicator that matching them manually was difficult.)
But certainly, if you look at the behavior of in-camera color profiles and standard manufacturer LUTs, there are clear differences in the looks provided. And still photographers agree on that, too - that if you're shooting JPEGs, then the color science of the camera is very importantwww.VideoAbe.com
"If you’re really in favor of free speech, then you’re in favor of freedom of speech for precisely the views you despise. Otherwise, you’re not in favor of free speech." - Noam Chomsky
Comment
-
Sold my fs7 a few days ago, locally. Lost about a grand from what I paid less than a year ago. Never made a penny with it due to the pandemic and other reasons. Never had a "relationship" to it the way Ive had with my A7SIII and before that fs5. Something about shooting with the loupe that disconnects me from the subject IMO. With the fs5 I could keep eye contact. Oh well... Ordered an fx6, which has everything IQ wise I wanted in the fs5. Hopefully, we'll have a good relationship ;)
Comment
Comment