Re: Film Look
Hi Glen - I've used DVFilm before as well (on some DV footage from a cheap Sony TRV18 camera), and was pleased with the results. There was definitely some resolution loss and artifacting due to the deinterlacing, but I thought the results looked slightly better than simply deinterlacing the footage with Vegas (my NLE). I think DVFilm claims that it tries to minimize resolution loss in the non-moving parts of the frame (i.e. static background).
Also, DVFilm seemed to slightly reduce the overall contrast of my video (blacks seemed a bit lighter), but you could probably compensate for this by increasing the contrast of your rendered video (prior to processing with DVFilm).
Overall I thought it was pretty good software for the price. But, as other have mentioned on this thread, it is definitely no substitute for the DVX's progressive modes.
Hi Glen - I've used DVFilm before as well (on some DV footage from a cheap Sony TRV18 camera), and was pleased with the results. There was definitely some resolution loss and artifacting due to the deinterlacing, but I thought the results looked slightly better than simply deinterlacing the footage with Vegas (my NLE). I think DVFilm claims that it tries to minimize resolution loss in the non-moving parts of the frame (i.e. static background).
Also, DVFilm seemed to slightly reduce the overall contrast of my video (blacks seemed a bit lighter), but you could probably compensate for this by increasing the contrast of your rendered video (prior to processing with DVFilm).
Overall I thought it was pretty good software for the price. But, as other have mentioned on this thread, it is definitely no substitute for the DVX's progressive modes.
Comment