Yesterday was kind of like a very, very, very minorly early Christmas, as I got both the Voigtlander 25mm f/0.95 lens (see the "one candle" test in the AF100 section) but also the Lumix 100-300mm lens. I initially wasn't going to bother with the long lens, but seeing how much use we got out of "The Howitzer" (the Nikon 50-300mm) on "A Verse Before Dying", I wanted something similar, and seeing as the Lumix version offers OIS, and I think OIS is just simply mandatory in long lenses especially in a handheld camera like the GH2... well, I picked up the 100-300.
So what better way to test it out, than by shooting the moon?
So here's the Lumix 100-300, at 300mm, on the GH2, using Extended TeleConversion mode in 720p mode, to get the most magnified shot possible. If my math is right, this is like using a 2,340 mm lens on a 35mm stills camera. I found that it's almost an absolutely perfect match for the size of the moon; it pretty much perfectly filled the frame with only a pixel or two to spare, top to bottom.
Now will someone please, please stop me from buying more glass?
So what better way to test it out, than by shooting the moon?
So here's the Lumix 100-300, at 300mm, on the GH2, using Extended TeleConversion mode in 720p mode, to get the most magnified shot possible. If my math is right, this is like using a 2,340 mm lens on a 35mm stills camera. I found that it's almost an absolutely perfect match for the size of the moon; it pretty much perfectly filled the frame with only a pixel or two to spare, top to bottom.
Now will someone please, please stop me from buying more glass?

Comment