Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Canon R3

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Canon R3

    I'm really proud that there is no Canon R3 topic on this forum.

    It could mean that you guys are too busy shooting and dealing with imminent production issues and problems.

    ​​​​​​Or this forum is ...

    #2
    They’re all too busy talking about real cinema cameras like the iPhone 13
    "There is nothing permanent except change."
    Heraclitus

    www.liamhall.net
    TWITTER: @WordsbyLiam
    INSTAGRAM: @picsbyliam

    Comment


      #3
      Briefly mentioned in other threads. The camera video quality is presently unknown, since the YouGoobers didn't have a production model.

      In any case, R5 with or without the external recorder (Atomos Ninja 5) is a better tool for video. And it costs less too.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by DLD View Post
        In any case, R5 with or without the external recorder (Atomos Ninja 5) is a better tool for video. And it costs less too.
        AF capabilities at -7 EV makes it unique.

        Comment


          #5
          The micro HDMI makes it lame for video at $6,000!

          Comment


            #6
            I was also surprised there was no R3 thread formed. It looks like a beast. Not for me, especially since I'm Sony now. But if you want raw internal with top notch autofocus and decent ibis in a camera in this form factor... then this is all there is.

            Expensive for a mirrorless camera. And having internal ND, especially eND, would be such a boon for the gimbal b-roll shooter that such a camera could be
            www.AbeFilms.com

            All men are brothers

            Comment


              #7
              They are still "Canon-ing" it by not including C-Log2. Put it in the ALL-I for $6K!

              Comment


                #8
                nd? no
                1000fps? no

                well its not better than my r6 then is it

                http://www.sammorganmoore.com View my feature Film

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by morgan_moore View Post
                  well its not better than my r6 then is it
                  faster rolling shutter at least. but i agree that there are things one needs and things one doesn't. adding things one doesn't personally need doesn't improve the camera appeal for that user. I, for one, don't require raw, internal or otherwise. but me likey fast readout
                  www.AbeFilms.com

                  All men are brothers

                  Comment


                    #10
                    of course im joking - im sure its better than my r6 - but nothing a client will notice or will change the game (1000fps burst) that makes it a 'must have'

                    if id dropped my toys into the soup and had an insurance cheque I d be looking at it.
                    http://www.sammorganmoore.com View my feature Film

                    Comment


                      #11
                      The eye based AF seems to be a bit iffy, depending on the eye of the user. Pretty gnarly for sports/action shooters though. Video isn't bad either.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by morgan_moore View Post
                        of course im joking - im sure its better than my r6 - but nothing a client will notice or will change the game (1000fps burst) that makes it a 'must have'
                        According to my analysis, the R3 is only 10% better than the R6
                        www.AbeFilms.com

                        All men are brothers

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X