3D and Photographt Comparison - DVXuser.com -- The online community for filmmaking

Taylor Moore · 08-10-2006, 10:13 AM

Interesting side by side photography to 3D render using the maxwell render...

http://www.maxwellrender.com/forum/v...ic.php?t=14254

oneinfiniteloop · 08-10-2006, 10:29 AM

Yeah, saw that, pretty impressive. I was talking some people and they say Maxwell is good for Arch stuff, but not there for film quality stuff.

mikkowilson · 08-10-2006, 10:30 AM

WOW!

That is seriously impressive! You can't tell the difference any more. You can tell they are different, but you can't tell which is which!

- Mikko ... actually looks better when moddled in 2d

Anhar Miah · 08-11-2006, 03:49 AM

well, its good, buuuut, the real ones boxes are irregular, they have deformations where as the CG's have perfect straight boxes (too "clean") look again you'll see what I mean, but still technicially this it proves that the maths calcs for the lighting behave as they should.

Anhar

BLUESPIDER · 08-12-2006, 01:36 AM

I'm scared..

Anhar Miah · 08-12-2006, 07:35 PM

Sooo, I tried to replicate the scene:

(ps ITS hard to get the light right!!)

arrrgggg I hate using GI

Taylor Moore · 08-12-2006, 07:55 PM

Anhar are you using Max? with what GI package?

surf · 08-13-2006, 01:28 AM

nice. you have to knoww the lighting very well...

Anhar Miah · 08-13-2006, 04:58 AM

Vray,

I think I may need to wack the GI intensity down a bit, cuz it looks way too bright..

The worst thing is, light testing takes, hours, even if you tweak some values you have to wait to re-calculate it and my ancient machine takes a good 15-20 minutes

I may re-render it later with some lower light values.

Anhar

Anhar Miah · 08-13-2006, 07:27 AM

well, had another crack at it:

Can't seem to get the reds and green to be a "moody" colour like in the maxwell tests

08-10-2006, 10:13 AM	#1
Taylor Moore Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Kelowna, BC Posts: 1,615	3D and Photographt Comparison Interesting side by side photography to 3D render using the maxwell render... http://www.maxwellrender.com/forum/v...ic.php?t=14254 __________________ www.pixelsteam.com

08-10-2006, 10:29 AM	#2
oneinfiniteloop Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Jacksonville, FL Posts: 2,376	Yeah, saw that, pretty impressive. I was talking some people and they say Maxwell is good for Arch stuff, but not there for film quality stuff. __________________ never updated

08-10-2006, 10:30 AM	#3
mikkowilson Steadi-Guru Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Juneau, Alaska, USA Posts: 8,620	WOW! That is seriously impressive! You can't tell the difference any more. You can tell they are different, but you can't tell which is which! - Mikko ... actually looks better when moddled in 2d __________________ Mikko Wilson Steadicam Owner / Operator - Juneau, Alaska, USA +1 (907) 321-8387 - mikkowilson@hotmail.com - www.mikkowilson.com

08-11-2006, 03:49 AM	#4
Anhar Miah 4xy(x-3)(x^2+3x+9) Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: United Kingdom Posts: 2,791 Blog Entries: 6	well, its good, buuuut, the real ones boxes are irregular, they have deformations where as the CG's have perfect straight boxes (too "clean") look again you'll see what I mean, but still technicially this it proves that the maths calcs for the lighting behave as they should. Anhar __________________ Rabbi Zidni 'Ilma {20:114} Blog: my website (beta version)

08-12-2006, 01:36 AM	#5
BLUESPIDER DVXuser Ninja Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Cambodia Posts: 4,288	I'm scared.. __________________ IMDB

08-12-2006, 07:35 PM	#6
Anhar Miah 4xy(x-3)(x^2+3x+9) Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: United Kingdom Posts: 2,791 Blog Entries: 6	Sooo, I tried to replicate the scene: (ps ITS hard to get the light right!!) arrrgggg I hate using GI __________________ Rabbi Zidni 'Ilma {20:114} Blog: my website (beta version)

08-12-2006, 07:55 PM	#7
Taylor Moore Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Kelowna, BC Posts: 1,615	Anhar are you using Max? with what GI package? __________________ www.pixelsteam.com

08-13-2006, 01:28 AM	#8
surf Senior Member Join Date: May 2005 Location: Hungary Posts: 1,604	nice. you have to knoww the lighting very well... __________________ surf http://www.smart.atw.hu

08-13-2006, 04:58 AM	#9
Anhar Miah 4xy(x-3)(x^2+3x+9) Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: United Kingdom Posts: 2,791 Blog Entries: 6	Vray, I think I may need to wack the GI intensity down a bit, cuz it looks way too bright.. The worst thing is, light testing takes, hours, even if you tweak some values you have to wait to re-calculate it and my ancient machine takes a good 15-20 minutes I may re-render it later with some lower light values. Anhar __________________ Rabbi Zidni 'Ilma {20:114} Blog: my website (beta version)

08-13-2006, 07:27 AM	#10
Anhar Miah 4xy(x-3)(x^2+3x+9) Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: United Kingdom Posts: 2,791 Blog Entries: 6	well, had another crack at it: Can't seem to get the reds and green to be a "moody" colour like in the maxwell tests __________________ Rabbi Zidni 'Ilma {20:114} Blog: my website (beta version)

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode