|
|
|||||||
| DVXuser News Site news, events, Industry news |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Philippines
Posts: 891
|
seems pretty good on paper but...
$7,999. $6,799. OUCH thats pricey! |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Bronze Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 1,752
|
"three Canon developed and designed native 1920 x 1080 CMOS image sensors" -- No CCDs. I expect prices on used A1/H1 to go up.
CF cards are a logical choice for 50 Mbit/s speed, and I think Canon also makes them. I saw CF cards with Canon logo. Nothing is said about Type II (thick) cards. Full manual focus with hard stops. 4.0-inch, 1.23-megapixel LCD monitor, 1.55-megapixel color electronic viewfinder -- better than on the Sonys. waveform monitor and vectorscope |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Philippines
Posts: 891
|
no word on 1/2" or 1/3"... most likely 1/3"
love the features.. but the price is too high.. would you pick this over an EX1R? |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Bronze Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 1,752
|
What do you mean no word? It is a 1/3-inch block.
With $3,000 price gap Canon is either going to continue with the HDV models, or it has another cheaper lineup up its sleeve, similar to the HMC150 and the NX5/AX2000. I wish they also make a smaller model similar to the HMC40. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Philippines
Posts: 891
|
Sorry but i dont see it on the link! i probably missed it or it was not written
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 151
|
I am sure that at first (like all new models) it will be bugged with problems (like the new Sony), plus unproven track record in NLE, 1/3" chip and more $$$ then EX1, I think EX1 still will be hard to beat.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Bronze Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 1,752
|
I wonder how well MXF works with FAT32, how well clips can be split in 2GB or 4GB chunks and then recombined. Do Sony and Pana use a different file system (UDF? or something else?) to allow for long contiguous files?
In regards to pricing: MSRP is $3-4K lower than the HPX300/370. Handheld form-factor and lower bitrate. On another hand, better LCD/EVF, a long-GOP but still a good codec and cheap, cheap, cheap media compared to P2 (price difference is almost tenfold, AND you gain twice more recording time over AVC-I 100 with about the same visual quality). Last edited by Cranky; 04-07-2010 at 11:16 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 38,953
|
Current XDCAM-EX and P2 use MXF on FAT32, it's already a known and solved workflow.
Quote:
__________________
. . . . ![]() The HMC Book The HMC150 Book The HVX Book The DVX Book HVX BootCamp DVD Sound For Film & TV |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|