Hi,
I put together a 7 minute video, it is compressed (H.264 @ 8kbps) :
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=6PUL5X80
There are some macro blocking and compression artifacts in the dark blue and black sky due to the compression, this is the original flag pole shot for comparison in DVCPRO HD:
http://www.sendspace.com/file/u2347l
Enjoy,
Thread: More footage
Results 1 to 10 of 18
-
Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Posts
- 36
06-04-2007 02:30 AM
-
Senior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Location
- NE of London, UK
- Posts
- 2,347
06-04-2007 03:51 AM
Thanks!
I can't get the 2nd clip to play. Is it standard DVCPROHD?
-
Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Posts
- 36
06-04-2007 04:10 AM
yes DVCPROHD after reverse pull ( 1024 24P (0ve 60i) -> cinema tool ->1020 24P), file its big though (20', 230.9 MB).
-
Senior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Location
- NE of London, UK
- Posts
- 2,347
06-04-2007 04:32 AM
I can't open the file at all. Cinema Tools says that there is "No codec for this clip." Is anyone else struggling with it?
Also I noticed that there is a lot of CA in the footage. Is it the 17x Fuji? is CAC on? What do you think of the lens?
-
Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Posts
- 36
06-04-2007 07:55 AM
it's the fuji 17X with CAC.
I zoomed all the way in & out and look for high contrast scenarios (trees and sky), I think for the price, is not that bad. I'm happy with the lense, it is what I could afford anyways, it does the job, I guess a little bit of sharpness would be nice, Jan (Panasonic) mentioned the canon is a little bit sharper. Compared to the CA I used to get with my HD100 at full zoom, this is nothing!
BR,
GustavoLast edited by gustavotg; 06-04-2007 at 08:54 AM.
-
06-04-2007 10:17 AM
I didn't see much CA... Where is the offending CA? I thought the lens looked pretty good (considering the price).
-
06-04-2007 10:33 AM
Thanks for sharing the footage. My observations (after looking at it on a slightly larger monitor)
I think the image looks very impressive. Very low noise and grain free. It all looked pretty sharp - so I'm guessing focussing is not a problem, even with the 1.5in viewfinder. I could see the CA on high contrast edges - but it didn't seem to "scream" at you. The CAC function seems to mute it, and I've used considerably more expensive lenses which have had far more hideously obvious CA.
And the colour rendition - of course - looks gorgeous.
Having seen this I now wish Panasonic Europe weren't such arses, and actually sold this camera at a reasonable price over here!
-
06-04-2007 11:21 AM
How much more is the HPX here compared to the US...?
Originally Posted by Alex Leith
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
I LIKE FOOD. FOOD IS GOOD.
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-
06-04-2007 02:00 PM
The HPX in the UK (with 4 x 16GB cards) is can be found for around £10,000 (ex VAT) which is about $19,900.
I am reliably informed that in the USA the same package can be found for about $13,500 which is about £6,800.
£3,200 is a hell of a premium to pay - and yes I know there is a 19% EU import duty that Panasonic have to pay, but Sony XDCAM HD camcorders manage to be very slighly cheaper here than they are in the US...
What gives?
-
06-04-2007 02:02 PM
As someone suggested - perhaps a trip to the US is in order... although I know I'd be the one that got stopped in customs on the way back! (guilty face) Hee! Hee!




More footage

