Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 56789
Results 81 to 86 of 86
  1. Collapse Details
    #81
    Default
    Well, there's yer problem...



    P.S. Had to use the uncompressed image... REDCODE got too blurry to tell if it's male or female...
    Last edited by Sarmoti; 11-22-2006 at 10:50 PM.
    Matthew Greene
    Technical Director / Media Producer
    Siegfried & Roy Present


     

  2. Collapse Details
    #82
    Senior Member Brook Willard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Orange, CA
    Posts
    502
    Default
    Now THAT'S great.
    "I've heard that this project is impossible... hehe" ~ Jim Jannard
    The Pursuit of Happyness


     

  3. Collapse Details
    #83
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,100
    Default
    Sarmoti, that is awesome. Can RED do the same as in Blade Runner, see details around the corner, behind a door frame?


     

  4. Collapse Details
    #84
    Two-Hip Shakur Beat Takeshi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    On the edge
    Posts
    6,036
    Default
    LOL!
    I thought i saw something in there.
    UrbanMouse.com

    2013 Narrative Reel




     

  5. Collapse Details
    #85
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    412
    Default
    Thanks to all who obliged my request.

    I think the large blocks in the first image are optimization patches. Graeme is probably coding it to isolate areas which have finer detail, in order to compress them differently from large even areas. Almost like an OctTree compression scheme. Which is really a good hybrid between your normal block encoders, except he's encoding within a basic block compression scheme.

    My opinion on Jack's image isn't a focus issue. If that's from the uncompressed it's probably just a bunch number of hairs falling in an awkward place for the de-mosaic algorithm as was originally suggested.

    Graeme I would pose one question to you: when I compress a JPEG2000 in photoshop there are two compression schemes, one of them generates funny little + marks. One of them always creates a clean image. Sorry I can't remember which is which (and again no workstation nearby). But I think the "Fast" one doesn't generate the + marks and actually creates in my opinion more accurate highly compressed images... are those visual + marks intersections of optimzation boxes? I can see one of the + in one of the first images, where some crankes the contrast on the compressed image... it worries me more than softness just because it's actually a visual artifact that looks digital. Any idea what those are? How to optimize those? Edit: (http://www.nicedissolve.com/images/redcode2.png) You can see them here.
    Last edited by im.thatoneguy; 11-23-2006 at 02:07 AM.
    - Gavin Greenwalt
    im.thatoneguy[remove]@gmail.com


     

  6. Collapse Details
    #86
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    11
    Default
    Quote Originally Posted by Sarmoti
    Well, there's yer problem...

    See? I told you guys there was something with the hair


     

Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 56789

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •