Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 31 to 36 of 36
  1. Collapse Details
    #31
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    1,495
    Default
    Quote Originally Posted by Danilo Del Tufo View Post
    Hi Doug, all are good points. My doubts are related to autofocus performance of S1H, I've collected various opinions till now, it works enough (few people) and it doesn't work at all (more people). If there was not problems with autofocus I had taken the decision directly to S1H, but autofocus for me is very important.
    You best rent the camera and see it for yourself

    And oh pleeeeaaaase shorten that novel aka signature. Content is disappearing in this repeating lists.
    Last edited by Clermond; 02-12-2020 at 12:03 PM. Reason: reasons


    Reply With Quote
     

  2. Collapse Details
    #32
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    1,495
    Default
    Quote Originally Posted by Doug Jensen View Post
    My only native L-mount is the Sigma 35mm f/1.4 art lens. AF sucks, but otherwise, a very, very nice lens.

    I'll be using the camera mostly with my existing PL lenses, so not too interested in investing more $ in additional native lenses.
    Sigma lenses are worse in terms of AF than native Panasonic L lenses.
    The Panasonic AF also needs light. Even in AF-S for stills with native Panasonic lenses it fails short after sunset.


    Reply With Quote
     

  3. Collapse Details
    #33
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    2,322
    Default
    Quote Originally Posted by Clermond View Post
    Sigma lenses are worse in terms of AF than native Panasonic L lenses.
    Good to know. But the Sigma lens is not even close to good enough for AF, so if the Panasonic lenses are 5x better they still wouldn't be good enough! :-)


    Reply With Quote
     

  4. Collapse Details
    #34
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    1,495
    Default
    Quote Originally Posted by Doug Jensen View Post
    Good to know. But the Sigma lens is not even close to good enough for AF, so if the Panasonic lenses are 5x better they still wouldn't be good enough! :-)
    5x zero is still zero.


    Reply With Quote
     

  5. Collapse Details
    #35
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Rhode Island
    Posts
    667
    Default
    I have tried the two Sigma lens, 35mm & 18-35, and the Panasonic S Pro are not five times better for autofocus. I find both can't cut it for auto focus. At least in a working environment for me.


    Reply With Quote
     

  6. Collapse Details
    #36
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    2,322
    Default
    Quote Originally Posted by Paul Cronin View Post
    I have tried the two Sigma lens, 35mm & 18-35, and the Panasonic S Pro are not five times better for autofocus. I find both can't cut it for auto focus. At least in a working environment for me.
    Paul, thanks for the info. Good to know.


    Reply With Quote
     

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •