Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15
  1. Collapse Details
    #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    659
    Default
    Quote Originally Posted by NorBro View Post
    Looks like a mess, TBH.
    I guess that comes from trying to cover all bases and be everything to everyone. That's a tough ask even for Sony with its market spread.

    Chris Young


    Reply With Quote
     

  2. Collapse Details
    #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    5,898
    Default
    Let's not forget FX6 either. Nothing is known about it at this point - let's I assume APS-C 4K sensor from A6600 with the same AF but better codec - and a lot of FS5/FS7 owners might give that a go too.


    0 out of 1 members found this post helpful.
    Reply With Quote
     

  3. Collapse Details
    #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Berlin
    Posts
    1,475
    Default
    In one of the interviews it sounded like the FX moniker was to indicate full frame. Would be strange if the FX6 wasn’t full frame. Then it could just be called FS5mkIII. Unless it’s just a FX9 with S35 Sensor. But that seems unlikely too.
    Sony NEX-FS700R | A7S | Odyssey 7Q+ | Atomos Ninja V
    Sony 24-70/2.8 GM, 70-200/2.8GM, SEL 50/1.8, 35/1.8, 18-105/4, FE 28-70 | Samyang 16, 35 & 85mm Cine
    Sachtler Flowtech 75 | Benro S8
    MacBook Pro 2018 6-core i7 2.6 ghz / 32gb ram / 512gb HD | macOS Mojave
    Hackintosh i7-8700K 6-core 3.7 ghz / 32 gb ram / 512gb NVMe / Radeon RX 580 | macOS Mojave


    Reply With Quote
     

  4. Collapse Details
    #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    381
    Default
    Chances are regardless or full frame or S35 that codecs will be limited to XAVC-L and no 10-bit 4k.


    Reply With Quote
     

  5. Collapse Details
    #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    5,898
    Default
    Quote Originally Posted by dmitrizigany View Post
    In one of the interviews it sounded like the FX moniker was to indicate full frame. Would be strange if the FX6 wasn’t full frame. Then it could just be called FS5mkIII. Unless it’s just a FX9 with S35 Sensor. But that seems unlikely too.
    This is reasonable too.

    A6600 looks really good, even with 8-bit. With a better codec, it'll look even better.


    Reply With Quote
     

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •