Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. Collapse Details
    Anamorphics + FS7 = bad idea?
    #1
    Junior Member mattmealer's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Fresno, CA
    Posts
    16
    Default
    I have a potential music video project for which I'm thinking about using anamorphic lenses in conjunction with my FS7. Has anyone tried this particular combination? (thinking 2x rather than 1.33x)

    Am I correct in thinking I can shoot in UHD, de-squeeze in post, and crop to create a true 2.39 widescreen image in HD?

    How would I go about monitoring the image while shooting? Any tips and tricks re: frame guides on either the stock Sony EVF or a SmallHD 501 monitor?

    If this is a terrible idea, or if there's a much better way of doing this, I'd love to hear it ;)


    Reply With Quote
     

  2. Collapse Details
    #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    1,300
    Default
    I think you can only/best use 1.3 crop for 16-9 sensors .. 2 X for 4-3 sensor.. ?


    Reply With Quote
     

  3. Collapse Details
    #3
    Senior Member Grug's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    3,480
    Default
    You'll be throwing away a fair bit of your sensor cropping down to 2.39:1, and monitoring becomes a pain in the ass, and you'll lose some FoV as well.

    So there are certainly compromises.

    On the plus side though, you'll be cropping off the worst of the optical funkiness in the corners. So that will actually improve your apparent image quality a bit.

    Personally, I'd suggest 1.3x lenses (or renting a 4:3 camera). If nothing else it'll make your day MUCH easier operationally.

    Shooting 2x scope on 16:9 sensors gets pretty messy, pretty quickly.


    Reply With Quote
     

  4. Collapse Details
    #4
    Junior Member mattmealer's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Fresno, CA
    Posts
    16
    Default
    Yeah, being able to monitor a reasonably representative image is definitely a concern.

    Anyone have thoughts on the 1.33x vs 2x question? Is shooting anamorphic worth the trouble if not going 'all the way' (i.e. with 2x lenses), so to speak?

    Obviously the easiest solution would be to test for myself, of course...but living in an area without anything resembling a film rental house makes doing so somewhat financially prohibitive.


    Reply With Quote
     

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •