Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12
  1. Collapse Details
    Tokina 16-26mm 2.8
    #1
    Bronze Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    292
    Default
    Has anyone tried this lens with a C300 I/II? How did it go?


    Reply With Quote
     

  2. Collapse Details
    #2
    Senior Member Eric Coughlin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    1,759
    Default
    No. Why would anyone want to try any lens with a Canon camera? Canon cameras are stupid and overpriced.


    Reply With Quote
     

  3. Collapse Details
    #3
    Senior Member ReelWorksMedia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Richmond Va
    Posts
    957
    Default
    Quote Originally Posted by Eric Coughlin View Post
    No. Why would anyone want to try any lens with a Canon camera? Canon cameras are stupid and overpriced.

    Eric....now go sit in the corner and think about what you've done.


    Reply With Quote
     

  4. Collapse Details
    #4
    Senior Member scorsesefan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Queens, New York
    Posts
    1,522
    Default
    Quote Originally Posted by Eric Coughlin View Post
    No. Why would anyone want to try any lens with a Canon camera? Canon cameras are stupid and overpriced.
    Ah, a fellow contrarian ;)


    Reply With Quote
     

  5. Collapse Details
    #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    213
    Default
    Quote Originally Posted by Eric Coughlin View Post
    No. Why would anyone want to try any lens with a Canon camera? Canon cameras are stupid and overpriced.
    I just don't understand these sarcastic posts where you don't even answer the question. You really like Canon. Cool... to each their own I guess.

    Re: the actual lens, it's fine but not really great. 16-28 is a pretty small range even at 2.8. You're not getting the full frame benefits of the lens anyways - Tokina 11-16 is a better bargain and the Sigma 18-35 is a better lens overall IMO.


    Reply With Quote
     

  6. Collapse Details
    #6
    Senior Member Eric Coughlin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    1,759
    Default
    Quote Originally Posted by remsyatassi View Post
    I just don't understand these sarcastic posts where you don't even answer the question.


    Reply With Quote
     

  7. Collapse Details
    #7
    Bronze Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    292
    Default
    Quote Originally Posted by Eric Coughlin View Post
    No. Why would anyone want to try any lens with a Canon camera? Canon cameras are stupid and overpriced.
    Stop playing with your penis Eric...


    0 out of 2 members found this post helpful.
    Reply With Quote
     

  8. Collapse Details
    #8
    Bronze Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    292
    Default
    Quote Originally Posted by Eric Coughlin View Post
    DUMB sarcasm. No wonder this world is poo pooed when morons like you cannot answer a SIMPLE question.


    0 out of 2 members found this post helpful.
    Reply With Quote
     

  9. Collapse Details
    #9
    Senior Member indiawilds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    New Delhi, India
    Posts
    1,255
    Default
    "Only Two things are infinite: The universe and human stupidity; and I am not sure about the former" - Albert Einstein


    Reply With Quote
     

  10. Collapse Details
    #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    1,997
    Default
    Quote Originally Posted by Eric Coughlin View Post
    No. Why would anyone want to try any lens with a Canon camera? Canon cameras are stupid and overpriced.
    I shouldn't support this kind of behavior, but HA, sir.

    But actually I'd kinda like to know the answer to the original question too. I haven't shot much with this sensor size so my idea of which focal lengths are capable of what isn't very solid. Would 16-28 make for a good wide range? Is the wider range of the 11-16 better for the things you might use a lens that wide for? If I'm doing my math right the 11-16 is almost 1.5 times wider at its widest than the 16-28.
    Last edited by Josh Bass; 06-24-2016 at 04:10 AM.


    Reply With Quote
     

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •