See the top rated post in this thread. Click here

Page 3 of 124 FirstFirst 12345671353103 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 1233
  1. Collapse Details
    #21
    Senior Member macgregor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    in the Canary Islands
    Posts
    1,801
    Default
    Quote Originally Posted by ZazaCast View Post
    The title of the clip is "F35"....so, I guess it's a Sony F35!
    (maybe?)
    And Zaza is the winner... XD

    www.macgregor.autoecstasy.com

    Macgregoris a trademark of Miguel de Olaso


    Reply With Quote
     

  2. Collapse Details
    #22
    Senior Member Samuel H's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Madrid, Spain
    Posts
    3,111
    Default
    wow, you got a big boy! congrats!


    Reply With Quote
     

  3. Collapse Details
    #23
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    cornwall UK
    Posts
    3,322
    Default
    Without being rude - what did it cost

    I have seen them around the price of a R1 and 1/4 of an alexa

    What rationalle made you choose this over the 'current' S35 cams?

    S


    Reply With Quote
     

  4. Collapse Details
    #24
    Default
    Quote Originally Posted by morgan_moore View Post
    Without being rude - what did it cost

    I have seen them around the price of a R1 and 1/4 of an alexa

    What rationalle made you choose this over the 'current' S35 cams?

    S
    Surely 4:4:4 colour space and no beyer pattern on the sensor - at a guess. It is a very highly thought off ,very sharp . That and a CCD imager with the lack of rolling shutter. The only thing you might lose out on really seems to be lower light sensitivity. That and more expensive ancillaries (v locks, 19mm rods etc..)
    Quite a good idea over getting a new F3 or C300.


    Reply With Quote
     

  5. Collapse Details
    #25
    Senior Member macgregor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    in the Canary Islands
    Posts
    1,801
    Default
    Quote Originally Posted by morgan_moore View Post
    Without being rude - what did it cost

    I have seen them around the price of a R1 and 1/4 of an alexa

    What rationalle made you choose this over the 'current' S35 cams?

    S
    I paid about the price of a F3 or C300.
    Reasons?Colorimetry, dynamic range, resolution... well you just can't compare those to the existing 35mm sensor prosumer cameras line.

    The F35 inherits all the work Panavision developed with the Genesis. I was always in love with this camera when it was launched 3 years ago and now that rental companies (the only ones who could afford them) are getting rid of them I though, heck, I'll get one even if I only use it to shoot home videos.

    To me, the F35 delivers the best film look of all current cameras. Yep, above Alexa and F65. And I´m not saying it's the best. I´m just saying it produces the best looking footage. The alexa might have more DR, the F65 might produce cleaner footage but to me they don't look as good as the Genesis/F35. Of course this is subjetive to everyone. But I could support my pov with 2 facts.
    The Red One or the Alexa for example have tons of Dynamic range, but it's mostly allocated in the shadows. To the point of having something like 7 stops of shadows and just 3 and a half stops in the highlights. Film doesn't work like that. Film shows way more dynamic range above mid gray. The F35, up to a point works in that way, delivering more detail in the highlights than in the shadows (I think it´s the only camera to do this actually, about 6 stops of highlights and about 5 stops of shadows). So this produces footage that resembles how film stock portrays reality. And I like that.
    Also the tone curve is very pleasent and doesn't scream digital as many other cameras do. Skintones looks just right and not plastic (ie: Red).

    You could say, hey but the F3 shoots in Slog! Isn't that the same then? Meeeh, nice try, but the short answer is not. I've shot a lot with the F3 and while it produces very clean images, it doesn't look very filmic where the F35 does. Not the same colorimetry. After all, Sony use to sell the F35 for like $180K for a reason I guess...

    The 2nd reason why I decided to go with this camera (besides the drop in price) is that we no longer need to carry a heavy HDCAM SR with it. Today, an inexpensive Hyperdeck shuttle will record beautifull 10bit 422 DNxHD files, ready to edit in real time (premiere, vegas, AE, Scratch...), easy to grade and really fast to copy. Perfect workflow.
    Last edited by macgregor; 08-04-2012 at 01:58 AM.

    www.macgregor.autoecstasy.com

    Macgregoris a trademark of Miguel de Olaso


    Reply With Quote
     

  6. Collapse Details
    #26
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    cornwall UK
    Posts
    3,322
    Default
    Very interesting - especially the cheap recording option!


    Reply With Quote
     

  7. Collapse Details
    #27
    Default
    Quote Originally Posted by macgregor View Post
    The Red One or the Alexa for example have tons of Dynamic range, but it's mostly allocated in the shadows. To the point of having something like 7 stops of shadows and just 3 and a half stops in the highlights. Film doesn't work like that. Film shows way more dynamic range above mid gray.
    Erm, you do understand that with a 14 stops of nearly uniformly distributed dynamic range as in Arri Log-C you can put mid-gray whereever you like, right?
    In fact, it defaults to 7.5 stops above midgray and 6.5 stops below midgray at base ISO 800 with standard exposure.

    (And grats on the new camera! )


    Reply With Quote
     

  8. Collapse Details
    #28
    Senior Member macgregor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    in the Canary Islands
    Posts
    1,801
    Default
    Alexa looks plasticy. And while you can set mid grey where you want it easily, it is no that easy to cut the dr in the shadows to a given amount.

    www.macgregor.autoecstasy.com

    Macgregoris a trademark of Miguel de Olaso


    Reply With Quote
     

  9. Collapse Details
    #29
    Senior Member Grug's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    1,334
    Default
    Very interesting decision Miguel. Having seen the prices F35s are going for these days I've had quite similar thoughts - F35 with a 4:2:2 ProRes/DNxHD recorder would be fantastic. How managable is the camera (size/weight-wise) for small crews in your opinion? I know the old recorders made it a huge beast.


    Reply With Quote
     

  10. Collapse Details
    #30
    Senior Member ZazaCast's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Upstate New York
    Posts
    7,720
    Default
    Quote Originally Posted by macgregor View Post
    And Zaza is the winner... XD
    Oh how I've waited to hear those words!

    I hope this is the camera you're using for your WarFest entry. Looking forward to that.




    Reply With Quote
     

Page 3 of 124 FirstFirst 12345671353103 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •