Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15
  1. Collapse Details
    Is 720p acceptable for cinema projection?
    #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Wellington, New Zealand
    Posts
    259
    Default
    Hello DVXusers,

    I wanted to get everyone's opinion on 720p.

    It would appear that camera manufacturers bundle 720p into the low-end DSLRs/video. I know 720p is still used for sport, however, it still seems 720p is marketed as a consumer/amateur HD format.

    I've seen 720p footage and it looks great. If you were, however, to project 720p in a cinema, would it be more pixelatted than viewing 1080p projection? Would 720p look more grainy and super sixteeny compared to the larger resolution of 1080p? I read somewhere 1080p was designed to be watched from a greater distance than 720p. But does 720p have a place for projection, or does 720p strictly belong for home viewing or youtube?

    Cheers
    David


    Reply With Quote
     

  2. Collapse Details
    #2
    Senior Member marvinhello's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Leeds, UK
    Posts
    294
    Default
    It's the content that matters, if your film is truely captivating then no one in the auditorium would complain about the resolution. Also, pay attention to the sound.
    Love everything about film.


    Reply With Quote
     

  3. Collapse Details
    #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    145
    Default
    720p footage won't look as good as 1080p footage, which won't look as good as S16 footage. Cinemas project at 2k so your 720p footage is a far cry from that. However, if the story's good enough, and it is technically proficient enough, many are abel to forgive a smaller resolution.


    Reply With Quote
     

  4. Collapse Details
    #4
    Senior Member clang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    1,121
    Default
    Quote Originally Posted by jax_rox View Post
    720p footage won't look as good as 1080p footage, which won't look as good as S16 footage. Cinemas project at 2k so your 720p footage is a far cry from that. However, if the story's good enough, and it is technically proficient enough, many are abel to forgive a smaller resolution.
    Yup, 720 is perfectly watchable, as indeed is even good old SD - I saw a whole heap of SD footage on a big screen at a recent 48 Hrs film making competition. If people are watching the pixels, it's probably a boring film

    But that's not to say a professional film distributor would agree...


    Reply With Quote
     

  5. Collapse Details
    #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    145
    Default
    A crap film shot on 35mm is still going to be a crap film. A good film shot in SD is still a good film.


    Reply With Quote
     

  6. Collapse Details
    #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    cornwall UK
    Posts
    3,320
    Default
    Also a camera that resolves 720 lines and has good colour/dr is better than nearly any other sub $10k camera

    So are we talking 720 or 720 ?

    To me 720*1280*3colours*24FPS = 66MBS, which is more than a lot of '1080' cameras kick out

    S


    Reply With Quote
     

  7. Collapse Details
    #7
    Senior Member RickyC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    153
    Default
    If you open up a 720p and 1080p image, its hard to tell a difference, sometimes even on big screens


    Reply With Quote
     

  8. Collapse Details
    #8
    Senior Member gonzo_entertainment's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Nashville
    Posts
    1,445
    Default
    Put the side by side on the big screen and yes you could absolutely tell the difference in the pixelation of the 720 vs the 1080 (as you could 1080 vs 4K or film). However, as noted not enough most audiences would care.


    Reply With Quote
     

  9. Collapse Details
    #9
    Senior Member maranfilms's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    capecod ma,
    Posts
    2,364
    Default
    I agree, we tend to forget that pixel peepers make up about .00009 percent of viewers that watch movies or what ever. Heck, I talk to alot of filmmakers and photographers that never get that crazy about looking for little flaws in image quality. Their concerned with things like "did I capture the emotion"

    People watch for the content, and despite what Gary Huff may argue (just bustin your chops Gary, I'm betting you did real well on your high school debate team. lol) thats what matters in the end. Was it a good film?, did it entertain?, did you leave the theatre saying? "that was awful, or great". I have seen hundreds of reporters standing on the outside of a theatre over the years asking viewers if they enjoyed a movie (even as far back as the exoricist, shining, and Jaws) moreless for viewer response. I have never seen a reporter ask anyone that just watched a movie if they noticed any blocky pixels, or artifacting in the image. I mean in a day and age where its common to spend hundreds of millions of dollars on a film, and the cgi still looks like crap a good amount of the time, people expect to see flaws that are blatently obvious, and they really dont care, they know there's no such thing as the Hulk, and therefore are willing to except less than realistic effects, and they dont let it spoil their experience, it's part of the process. Thats what movie making is, 90% fantasy, illusion, 10% reality. or even maybe less.

    If that were the case, we would never use a jump cut would we. People let their minds fill in the blanks, thats why movies work. Ok, still half a sleep, sorry for the run on.


    Reply With Quote
     

  10. Collapse Details
    #10
    Senior Member gonzo_entertainment's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Nashville
    Posts
    1,445
    Default
    Sound is the MUCH bigger issue. People will watch a film that looks pretty bad. They will instantly turn off a film that sounds bad.


    Reply With Quote
     

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •