Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17
  1. Collapse Details
    #11
    Senior Member wgzn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    houston, TX
    Posts
    4,470
    Default
    for about $3 more and a couple router passes i can integrate the keel thing.


    Reply With Quote
     

  2. Collapse Details
    #12
    Senior Member ZazaCast's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Upstate New York
    Posts
    7,720
    Default
    Quote Originally Posted by wgzn View Post
    for about $3 more and a couple router passes i can integrate the keel thing.
    I'd do that...hate read about your camera taking a crash!




    Reply With Quote
     

  3. Collapse Details
    #13
    Senior Member wgzn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    houston, TX
    Posts
    4,470
    Default
    shooting with it all day, i never had a problem taking the camera +carriage off and setting it on the ground. but it WAS a pain to have to do it every time i moved the rig.
    if it doubled the material cost, id say just deal. but for just a few bucks more? would be kinda dumb not to. ; )


    Reply With Quote
     

  4. Collapse Details
    #14
    Senior Member drapeama's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Maskinongé, Québec
    Posts
    463
    Default
    Quote Originally Posted by Jeremy_Sawatzky View Post
    simplicity and ingenuity at its finest.
    I agree!
    Quote Originally Posted by wgzn View Post
    QUESTION: on the subject of the sled being completely separate from the rails...
    does the fact that the sled is completely not connected to the rails make this a deal breaker for anyone?
    Not for me, as my design isn't connected to the rails: the top bearing rolls on them while the side bearings keeps it along the rails. But you simply pull the "sled" to remove it from the rails. Of course, the rails are adjusted in consequence to make the whole thing "tight" enough, so it rolls without problems, but it's not too loose at the same time.
    But no, it's not for me. I mean, when you know it, you don't let the camera on it if you're not operating it!
    I DO IT BECAUSE I CAN. I CAN BECAUSE I WANT TO. I WANT TO BECAUSE YOU SAID I COULDN'T.



    Reply With Quote
     

  5. Collapse Details
    #15
    Senior Member wgzn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    houston, TX
    Posts
    4,470
    Default
    decided to forego the keel concept in the interest of size+simplicity.
    if someone is going to be that careless with their camera. they'll have bigger issues than this ; )

    this is pretty close to how the final device will look. but im going to add 1/4" extended vertical base to the pryamid shapes and rout a groove in the base that same depth to accept it. so it will be the same overall profile as this, just be a bit more rigid - not that it needs it. this baby is STIFF!

    and i got rid of the bolts in favor of just gluing the aluminum to the foundation...

    base.jpg
    Last edited by wgzn; 07-05-2012 at 03:28 PM.


    Reply With Quote
     

  6. Collapse Details
    #16
    Senior Member wgzn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    houston, TX
    Posts
    4,470
    Default
    progressed the design and put it up on kickstarter:

    drivingboardmark2.jpg

    (click the logo above to go to the kickstarter page)

    workingmodel.jpg


    Reply With Quote
     

  7. Collapse Details
    #17
    Senior Member wgzn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    houston, TX
    Posts
    4,470
    Default
    just added a $20 "parts list and plans" and a $100 "bones" (ready to assemble parts) reward levels for the DIY-ers out there...


    Reply With Quote
     

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •